MARC details
000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
04112nam a22004817a 4500 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
230727s20232023 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
International Standard Serial Number |
2574-3805 |
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
Standard number or code |
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18061 [doi] |
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
Standard number or code |
2805966 [pii] |
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
Standard number or code |
PMC10265293 [pmc] |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Original cataloging agency |
Ovid MEDLINE(R) |
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC) |
PMID |
37310739 |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Comparison of Work Patterns Between Physicians and Advanced Practice Practitioners in Primary Care and Specialty Practice Settings. |
251 ## - Source |
Source |
JAMA Network Open. 6(6):e2318061, 2023 06 01. |
252 ## - Abbreviated Source |
Abbreviated source |
JAMA netw. open. 6(6):e2318061, 2023 06 01. |
253 ## - Journal Name |
Journal name |
JAMA network open |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
Year |
2023 |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
Manufacturer |
FY2023 |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
Publication date |
2023 06 01 |
265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE] |
Publication status |
epublish |
265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE] |
Medline status |
MEDLINE |
266 ## - Date added to catalog |
Date added to catalog |
2023-07-27 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Abstract |
Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional, national study of clinicians found significant differences in visit and EHR patterns for physicians compared with APPs across specialty types. By underscoring the different current usage of physicians vs APPs across specialty types, this study helps place into context the work and visit patterns of physicians compared with APPs and serves as a foundation for evaluations of clinical outcomes and quality. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Abstract |
Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, cross-sectional study used EHR data from physicians and APPs (ie, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) at all US institutions that used Epic Systems' EHR between January and May 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to April 2023. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Abstract |
Importance: Despite the increasing involvement of advanced practice practitioners (APPs; ie, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in care delivery across specialties, the work patterns of APPs compared with physicians and how they are integrated into care teams have not been well characterized. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Abstract |
Main Outcomes and Measures: Appointment scheduling patterns, percentage of new and established and level of evaluation and management (E/M) visits, and EHR use metrics per day and week. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Abstract |
Objective: To characterize differences between physicians and APPs across specialty types related to days with appointments, visit types seen, and time spent using the electronic health record (EHR). |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Abstract |
Results: The sample consisted of 217924 clinicians across 389 organizations, including 174939 physicians and 42985 APPs. Although primary care physicians were more likely than APPs to have more than 3 days per week with appointments (50 921 physicians [79.5%] vs 17095 APPs [77.9%]), this trend was reversed for medical (38645 physicians [64.8%] vs 8124 APPs [74.0%]) and surgical (24155 physicians [47.1%] vs 5198 APPs [51.7%]) specialties. Medical and surgical specialty physicians saw 6.7 and 7.4 percentage points, respectively, more new patient visits than did their APP counterparts, whereas primary care physicians saw 2.8 percentage points fewer new patient visits than did APPs. Physicians saw a greater percentage of level 4 or 5 visits across all specialties. Medical and surgical physicians spent 34.3 and 45.8 fewer minutes per day, respectively, using the EHR than did APPs in their specialties, whereas primary care physicians spent 17.7 minutes per day more. These differences translated to primary care physicians spending 96.3 minutes more per week using the EHR than APPs, whereas medical and surgical physicians spent 149.9 and 140.7 fewer minutes, respectively, than did their APP counterparts. |
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
Language note |
English |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
*Medicine |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
*Physicians |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Appointments and Schedules |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Cross-Sectional Studies |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Humans |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Primary Health Care |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Indexing |
Automated |
651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME |
Institution |
MedStar Health Research Institute |
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION |
Medline publication type |
Journal Article |
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Local Authors |
Apathy, Nate |
Institution Code |
MHRI |
790 ## - Authors |
All authors |
Apathy N, Edgman-Levitan S, Landon B, Rotenstein LS |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
DOI |
<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18061">https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18061</a> |
Public note |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18061 |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Koha item type |
Journal Article |
Item type description |
Article |