MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
03926nam a22004577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
221018s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Serial Number |
2325-9671 |
| 024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| Standard number or code |
10.1177_23259671221120212 [pii] |
| 024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| Standard number or code |
10.1177/23259671221120212 [doi] |
| 024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| Standard number or code |
PMC9403461 [pmc] |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
Ovid MEDLINE(R) |
| 099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC) |
|---|
| PMID |
36035892 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies. [Review] |
| 251 ## - Source |
|---|
| Source |
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 10(8):23259671221120212, 2022 Aug. |
| 252 ## - Abbreviated Source |
|---|
| Abbreviated source |
Orthop. j. sports med.. 10(8):23259671221120212, 2022 Aug. |
| 253 ## - Journal Name |
|---|
| Journal name |
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Year |
2022 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Manufacturer |
FY2023 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Publication date |
2022 Aug |
| 265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE] |
|---|
| Publication status |
epublish |
| 265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE] |
|---|
| Medline status |
PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
| 266 ## - Date added to catalog |
|---|
| Date added to catalog |
2022-10-20 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Background: Transosseous tunnel (TO) repair is considered the gold standard for patellar tendon rupture; however, suture anchor (SA) repair has emerged as a viable alternative in recent years. Although both these techniques are used widely in clinical practice, the most biomechanically optimal construct for patellar tendon repair remains unknown. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Conclusion: Our systematic review revealed that the use of SA fixation for patellar tendon repair was associated with lower cyclic gap displacement when compared with TO fixation. There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the repair techniques. Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Methods: A systematic review using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of SA and TO techniques for repair of a ruptured patellar tendon. The search phrase implemented was "patellar tendon repair." Meta-analysis was performed to provide a quantitative comparison of the 2 techniques with regard to ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap displacement. Weighted averages were calculated for all quantitative outcomes, and outcomes were summarized in a forest plot. A random-effects model was used to account for the heterogeneity among the included studies in the final statistical analysis. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Purpose: To examine published studies on the biomechanical properties of TO and SA fixation for patellar tendon repair in terms of ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap formation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in either outcome measure between the groups. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Results: Of 875 studies initially screened, the inclusion criteria were met by 7 studies, including 128 cadaveric specimens (66 SA, 62 TO). The pooled analysis from 6 studies reporting on gap displacement revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of SA versus TO fixation (P < .001). Pooled analysis from 7 studies reporting on ultimate load to failure did not reveal a statistically significant difference between the use of SA and TO for tendon repair (P = .465). |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Study Design: Systematic review. |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
|---|
| Language note |
English |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED |
| 651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME |
|---|
| Institution |
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital |
| 656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION |
|---|
| Department |
Orthopaedic Surgery Residency |
| 657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION |
|---|
| Medline publication type |
Journal Article |
| 657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION |
|---|
| Medline publication type |
Review |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Local Authors |
Gould, Heath |
| Institution Code |
MUMH |
| Program |
Orthopaedic Surgery Residency |
| Degree |
MD |
| Resident year |
Resident PGY 5 |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Local Authors |
Imbergamo, Casey |
| Institution Code |
MUMH |
| Program |
Orthopaedic Surgery Residency |
| Degree |
MD |
| Resident year |
Resident PGY 2 |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Local Authors |
Sequeira, Sean |
| Institution Code |
MUMH |
| Program |
Orthopaedic Surgery Residency |
| Degree |
MD |
| Resident year |
Resident PGY 2 |
| 790 ## - Authors |
|---|
| All authors |
Bano J, Gould H, Imbergamo C, Rate WR 4th, Sequeira S |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| DOI |
<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221120212">https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221120212</a> |
| Public note |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221120212 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Koha item type |
Journal Article |
| Item type description |
Article |
