Trends in user ratings and reviews of a popular yet inaccurate blood pressure-measuring smartphone app. (Record no. 3520)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02225nam a22003497a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180706s20182018 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1067-5027
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 10.1093/jamia/ocy060 [doi]
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 5025857 [pii]
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency Ovid MEDLINE(R)
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC)
PMID 29878236
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Trends in user ratings and reviews of a popular yet inaccurate blood pressure-measuring smartphone app.
251 ## - Source
Source Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2018 Jun 07
252 ## - Abbreviated Source
Abbreviated source J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jun 07
253 ## - Journal Name
Journal name Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Year 2018
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Manufacturer FY2018
266 ## - Date added to catalog
Date added to catalog 2018-07-06
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract Discussion: User reviews and ratings of a popular, inaccurate BP-measuring app were positive and uncommonly commented on its inaccuracy. Disclaimers attempting to prevent medical use of the app were ineffective. These findings support the need for more rigorous regulatory review of apps prior to their release.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract Materials and Methods: All iTunes app reviews for IBP v1.2.3 were downloaded and assessed for themes by two reviewers. Summary statistics for themes were tabulated with their associated star ratings.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract Objective: To understand whether user reviews of Instant Blood Pressure (IBP), an inaccurate, unregulated BP-measuring app reflected IBP's inaccuracy, to understand drivers for high and low ratings, and to understand if disclaimers prevented medical use.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract Results: Common themes included perceived accuracy (42% of all reviews, star rating mean 4.8, median 5), inaccuracy (10%, 2.0, 1), and convenience (34%, 4.7, 5). Nine percent documented IBP use in medical conditions (4.6, 5), and 2% mentioned IBP's disclaimer (2.7, 3).
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED
651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Institution MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department Internal Medicine
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION
Medline publication type Journal Article
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Urrea, Bruno
790 ## - Authors
All authors Appel LJ, Blumenthal RS, Macfarlane ZT, Martin SS, Miller Iii ER, O'Kelly AC, Plante TB, Urrea B
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
DOI <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy060">https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy060</a>
Public note https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy060
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal Article
Item type description Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          MedStar Authors Catalog MedStar Authors Catalog 07/06/2018   29878236 29878236 07/06/2018 07/06/2018 Journal Article

Powered by Koha