An Investigation into Gender Bias in the Evaluation of Orthopaedic Trainee Arthroscopic Skills. (Record no. 406)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03907nam a22004097a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220926s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1058-2746
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.024 [doi]
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code S1058-2746(22)00548-1 [pii]
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency Ovid MEDLINE(R)
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC)
PMID 35788056
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title An Investigation into Gender Bias in the Evaluation of Orthopaedic Trainee Arthroscopic Skills.
251 ## - Source
Source Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery. 2022 Jul 01
252 ## - Abbreviated Source
Abbreviated source J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jul 01
253 ## - Journal Name
Journal name Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Year 2022
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Manufacturer FY2023
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Publication date 2022 Jul 01
265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE]
Publication status aheadofprint
266 ## - Date added to catalog
Date added to catalog 2022-09-26
501 ## - WITH NOTE
Local holdings Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library:2004 - 2007
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Women surgeons receive lower compensation, hold fewer academic positions, and hold fewer leadership positions than men, particularly in orthopedic surgery. Gender bias at the trainee level has been demonstrated in various surgical subspecialties, but there is a lack of information on gender bias within the orthopedic training environment. This study investigated whether implicit gender bias is present in the subjective evaluation of orthopedic trainee arthroscopic skills.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract DISCUSSION: Trainee gender did not influence the ratings and comments participants gave for trainee arthroscopic skills, suggesting that gender bias may not play a major role in the evaluation of arthroscopic skill during orthopedic training. Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract METHODS: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a web-based survey was sent to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) members via the society's email listserv. Study participants were informed that the study was being done to develop a systematic evaluation method for trainees. The survey randomized participants to view and evaluate a pre-fellowship and a post-fellowship video of "Rachel" (she/her) or "Charles" (he/him) performing a 15-point diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy. The videos for Rachel and Charles were identical except for the pronouns used in the video. Participants evaluated the trainee's skill level using questions from the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). Blinded and de-identified additional comments regarding the trainee's skill were classified as positive, negative, or neutral. Statistical analyses were used to compare scores and comments between Rachel and Charles.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract RESULTS: Of 1115 active ASES members, 181 ASES members started the survey and 106 watched both videos and were included in the analysis. Of the 106 participants completing the survey, 96 (91%) were men and 10 (9%) were women with median [IQR] age of 44 [38-51]. A teaching role was reported by 84 of 106 participants (79%). There was no significant difference between pre-fellowship scores (p = 0.87) or between post-fellowship scores (p = 0.84) for the woman and man fellow. The numbers of comments classified as positive, negative, or neutral were not significantly different between the man and woman fellow (p = 0.19). Participants in teaching roles gave significantly lower scores to both fellows at both timepoints (p=0.04), and participants who had fellow trainees were more likely to give negative comments to both fellows (p = 0.02).
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED
651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Institution MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department Orthopedics
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION
Medline publication type Journal Article
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Hawken, Jessica B
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Murthi, Anand M
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Wright, Melissa A
790 ## - Authors
All authors Geng X, Hawken JB, Leape CP, Murthi AM, Wright MA
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
DOI <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.024">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.024</a>
Public note https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.024
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal Article
Item type description Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          MedStar Authors Catalog MedStar Authors Catalog 09/26/2022   35788056 35788056 09/26/2022 09/26/2022 Journal Article

Powered by Koha