Adequacy Rate of Magnesium Citrate Bowel Preparation in a Large Retrospective Cohort. (Record no. 545)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02309nam a22004097a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220516s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 0363-7913
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency Ovid MEDLINE(R)
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC)
PMID 35211711
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Adequacy Rate of Magnesium Citrate Bowel Preparation in a Large Retrospective Cohort.
251 ## - Source
Source Rhode Island Medicine. 105(2):46-50, 2022 Mar 01.
252 ## - Abbreviated Source
Abbreviated source R I Med. 105(2):46-50, 2022 Mar 01.
253 ## - Journal Name
Journal name Rhode Island medical journal (2013)
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Year 2022
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Manufacturer FY2022
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Publication date 2022 Mar 01
265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE]
Publication status epublish
266 ## - Date added to catalog
Date added to catalog 2022-05-16
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract CONCLUSION: MC bowel preparation is adequate, well tolerated, and inexpensive. In a large retrospective analysis, it compares favorably to other preparations.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Magnesium Citrate (MC) is not FDA approved as a colonoscopy preparation. Advantages include low cost, small volume and accessibility without prescription. We retrospectively evaluated bowel preparations used in a private gastroenterology practice. The sample size is the largest for any similar studies (n =19,173).
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract METHODS: Electronic Medical Records were queried for colonoscopies between 2010-2016. Bowel preps, indications (screening vs. other) and preparation adequacy were all recorded. Adequacy rates were calculated and compared using generalized linear modeling. Data were analyzed using SAS.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract RESULTS: The most common prep used was MC 2 bottles; screening (n=6,064, with 98.94% adequacy) and non-screening (n=3,251, with 99.29% adequacy), followed by MC 3 bottles; screening (n=2,757 with 90.35% adequacy), and non-screening (n=1,925 with 92.92% adequacy).
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element *Cathartics
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element *Organometallic Compounds
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Cathartics/tu [Therapeutic Use]
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Citric Acid/tu [Therapeutic Use]
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Humans
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Organometallic Compounds/tu [Therapeutic Use]
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Retrospective Studies
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department Gastroenterology Fellowship
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department MedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION
Medline publication type Journal Article
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors AlSamman, Mohd Amer
790 ## - Authors
All authors Abeid M, AlSamman MA, Baird GL, Leung S, Moustafa A, Shah SA
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal Article
Item type description Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          MedStar Authors Catalog MedStar Authors Catalog 05/16/2022   35211711 35211711 05/16/2022 05/16/2022 Journal Article

Powered by Koha