Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Standalone Versus Cage and Plate Constructs for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. (Record no. 6545)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03881nam a22004457a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210628s20212021 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 2211-4599
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 10.14444/8060 [doi]
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 8060 [pii]
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency Ovid MEDLINE(R)
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC)
PMID 33963034
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Standalone Versus Cage and Plate Constructs for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
251 ## - Source
Source International Journal of Spine Surgery. 15(3):403-412, 2021 Jun.
252 ## - Abbreviated Source
Abbreviated source Int J Spine Surg. 15(3):403-412, 2021 Jun.
253 ## - Journal Name
Journal name International journal of spine surgery
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Year 2021
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Manufacturer FY2021
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Publication date 2021 Jun
265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE]
Publication status ppublish
266 ## - Date added to catalog
Date added to catalog 2021-06-28
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has conventionally been performed using an allograft cage with a plate-and-screw construct. Recently, standalone cages have gained popularity due to theorized decreases in operative time and postoperative dysphagia. Few studies have compared these outcomes. Here, we directly compare the outcomes of plated versus standalone ACDF constructs.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study will help spine surgeons decide between using standalone or cage-and-plate constructs for ACDF. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright (c) 2021 ISASS.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract CONCLUSIONS: Standalone ACDF demonstrates higher, but not statistically significant, revision rates than plate-and-screw constructs, without the hypothesized decreased incidence of dysphagia or hoarseness and without decreased procedure duration or EBL. Surgeons may consider limiting use of these constructs to cases of adjacent segment disease. Larger studies with longer follow up are necessary to make more definitive conclusions.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients undergoing ACDF after June 2011 with at least 6 months of follow up was conducted. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between standalone and plated constructs. Multivariate regression analysis of the primary outcome, need for revision surgery, as well as several secondary outcomes, procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, disposition, and incidence of dysphagia, hoarseness, or surgical site infection, was completed.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract RESULTS: A total of 321 patients underwent ACDF and met inclusion-exclusion criteria, with mean follow-up duration of 20 months. Forty-six (14.3%) patients received standalone constructs, while 275 (85.7%) received plated constructs. Fourteen (4.4%) total revisions were necessary, 4 in the standalone group and 10 in the plated group, yielding revision rates of 8.7% and 3.6%, respectively (P = .125). Mean EBL was 98 mL in the standalone group and 63 mL in the plated group (P = .001). Mean procedure duration was 147 minutes in the standalone group and 151 minutes in the plated group (P = .800). Mean hospital stay was 3.6 days in the standalone group and 2.5 days in the plated group (P = .270). There was no significant difference in incidence of dysphagia (P = .700) or hoarseness (P = .700).
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED
651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Institution MedStar Washington Hospital Center
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department Neurosurgery
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department Neurosurgery Residency
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION
Medline publication type Journal Article
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Cobourn, Kelsey
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Conte, Anthony G
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Fayed, Islam
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Keating, Gregory
790 ## - Authors
All authors Altshuler M, Anaizi AN, Cobourn KD, Conte AG, Fayed I, Keating G, Makariou E, Nair MN, Sandhu FA, Spitz SM, Voyadzis JM
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
DOI <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8060">https://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8060</a>
Public note https://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8060
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal Article
Item type description Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          MedStar Authors Catalog MedStar Authors Catalog 06/28/2021   33963034 33963034 06/28/2021 06/28/2021 Journal Article

Powered by Koha