Characterizing placental stiffness using ultrasound shear-wave elastography in healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 302(5):1103-1112, 2020 11.PMID: 32676857Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Obstetrics and Gynecology/Maternal-Fetal MedicineForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Elasticity Imaging Techniques/mt [Methods] | *Placenta/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] | *Ultrasonography/mt [Methods] | Adult | Body Mass Index | Case-Control Studies | Female | Gestational Age | Humans | Infant, Newborn | Maternal Age | Parity | Placenta/pa [Pathology] | Pre-Eclampsia/pp [Physiopathology] | Pregnancy | Pregnancy Trimester, Second | Pregnancy Trimester, ThirdYear: 2020ISSN:
  • 0932-0067
Name of journal: Archives of gynecology and obstetricsAbstract: CONCLUSION: Compared to healthy pregnancies, placentas of preeclamptic pregnancies are stiffer and more heterogeneous. Placental stiffness is not affected by gestational age or the severity of preeclampsia but there is a correlation with higher BMI and poor perinatal outcomes.METHODS: In a case-control study, we recruited a total of 47 singleton pregnancies in the second and third trimesters of which 24 were healthy and 23 were diagnosed with preeclampsia. In vivo placental stiffness was measured once at the time of recruitment for each patient. Pregnancies with posterior placentas, multiple gestation, gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune disease, fetal growth restriction and congenital anomalies were excluded.PURPOSE: To measure the stiffness of the placenta in healthy and preeclamptic patients in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy using ultrasound shear-wave elastography (SWE). We also aimed to evaluate the effect of age, gestational age, gravidity, parity and body mass index (BMI) on placental stiffness and a possible correlation of stiffness with perinatal outcomes.RESULTS: The mean placental stiffness was significantly higher in preeclamptic pregnancies compared to controls in the third trimester (difference of means = 16.8; 95% CI (9.0, 24.5); P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in placental stiffness between the two groups in the second trimester or between the severe preeclampsia and preeclampsia without severe features groups (difference of means = 9.86; 95% CI (-5.95, 25.7); P >= 0.05). Peripheral regions of the placenta were significantly stiffer than central regions in the preeclamptic group (difference of means = 10.67; 95% CI (0.07, 21.27); P < 0.05), which was not observed in the control group (difference of means = 0.55; 95% CI (- 5.25, 6.35); P > 0.05). We did not identify a correlation of placental stiffness with gestational age, maternal age, gravidity or parity. However, there was a statistically significant correlation with BMI (P < 0.05). In addition, pregnancies with higher placental stiffness during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters had significantly reduced birth weight (2890 +/- 176 vs. 2420 +/- 219 g) and earlier GA (37.8 +/- 0.84 vs. 34.3 +/- 0.98 weeks) at delivery (P < 0.05).All authors: Eranki A, Fisher JP, Fries MH, Iqbal SN, Jacobs M, Kim PCW, Kuo CY, Rossi CT, Spiliopoulos MOriginally published: Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2020 Jul 16Fiscal year: FY2021Digital Object Identifier: ORCID: Date added to catalog: 2020-09-02
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 32676857 Available 32676857

CONCLUSION: Compared to healthy pregnancies, placentas of preeclamptic pregnancies are stiffer and more heterogeneous. Placental stiffness is not affected by gestational age or the severity of preeclampsia but there is a correlation with higher BMI and poor perinatal outcomes.

METHODS: In a case-control study, we recruited a total of 47 singleton pregnancies in the second and third trimesters of which 24 were healthy and 23 were diagnosed with preeclampsia. In vivo placental stiffness was measured once at the time of recruitment for each patient. Pregnancies with posterior placentas, multiple gestation, gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune disease, fetal growth restriction and congenital anomalies were excluded.

PURPOSE: To measure the stiffness of the placenta in healthy and preeclamptic patients in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy using ultrasound shear-wave elastography (SWE). We also aimed to evaluate the effect of age, gestational age, gravidity, parity and body mass index (BMI) on placental stiffness and a possible correlation of stiffness with perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS: The mean placental stiffness was significantly higher in preeclamptic pregnancies compared to controls in the third trimester (difference of means = 16.8; 95% CI (9.0, 24.5); P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in placental stiffness between the two groups in the second trimester or between the severe preeclampsia and preeclampsia without severe features groups (difference of means = 9.86; 95% CI (-5.95, 25.7); P >= 0.05). Peripheral regions of the placenta were significantly stiffer than central regions in the preeclamptic group (difference of means = 10.67; 95% CI (0.07, 21.27); P < 0.05), which was not observed in the control group (difference of means = 0.55; 95% CI (- 5.25, 6.35); P > 0.05). We did not identify a correlation of placental stiffness with gestational age, maternal age, gravidity or parity. However, there was a statistically significant correlation with BMI (P < 0.05). In addition, pregnancies with higher placental stiffness during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters had significantly reduced birth weight (2890 +/- 176 vs. 2420 +/- 219 g) and earlier GA (37.8 +/- 0.84 vs. 34.3 +/- 0.98 weeks) at delivery (P < 0.05).

English

Powered by Koha