Electronic health record "gag clauses" and the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2023 Jul 19PMID: 37468440Institution: MedStar Health Research Institute | MedStar Institute for InnovationDepartment: National Center for Human Factors in HealthcareForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED | Year: 2023ISSN:
  • 1067-5027
Name of journal: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAAbstract: CONCLUSIONS: Additional steps are necessary to promote the use of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature. Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected]: The policy change does not appear to have an impact on the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed EHR usability and safety-related peer-reviewed journal articles from 2015 to 2023 and quantified the number of articles containing screenshots. For those that did not contain screenshots, we identified whether they would have benefited from screenshots.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Office of the National Coordinator's policy change restricting the use of "gag clauses" in contracts between electronic health record (EHR) vendors and healthcare facilities increased the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature.RESULTS: When gag clauses were permitted 6 of 79 (7.6%) of articles contained screenshots and 8 (10.1%) would have benefited from screenshots. When gag clauses were restricted 3 of 40 (7.5%) contained screenshots and 8 (20%) would have benefited from screenshots.All authors: Bapna M, Miller K, Ratwani RMFiscal year: FY2024Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2023-08-15
No physical items for this record

CONCLUSIONS: Additional steps are necessary to promote the use of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature. Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].

DISCUSSION: The policy change does not appear to have an impact on the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed EHR usability and safety-related peer-reviewed journal articles from 2015 to 2023 and quantified the number of articles containing screenshots. For those that did not contain screenshots, we identified whether they would have benefited from screenshots.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Office of the National Coordinator's policy change restricting the use of "gag clauses" in contracts between electronic health record (EHR) vendors and healthcare facilities increased the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature.

RESULTS: When gag clauses were permitted 6 of 79 (7.6%) of articles contained screenshots and 8 (10.1%) would have benefited from screenshots. When gag clauses were restricted 3 of 40 (7.5%) contained screenshots and 8 (20%) would have benefited from screenshots.

English

Powered by Koha