Hemoglobin A1c, fasting glucose, and cardiovascular risk in a population with high prevalence of diabetes: the strong heart study.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Diabetes Care. 34(9):1952-8, 2011 Sep.PMID: 21788631Institution: MedStar Health Research InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralSubject headings: *Blood Glucose/me [Metabolism] | *Cardiovascular Diseases/bl [Blood] | *Cardiovascular Diseases/me [Metabolism] | *Diabetes Mellitus/bl [Blood] | *Diabetes Mellitus/me [Metabolism] | *Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated/me [Metabolism] | Aged | Cardiovascular Diseases/ep [Epidemiology] | Diabetes Mellitus/ep [Epidemiology] | Fasting/bl [Blood] | Female | Humans | Male | Middle Aged | Risk FactorsYear: 2011Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006ISSN:
  • 0149-5992
Name of journal: Diabetes | Diabetes careAbstract: CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with known or newly diagnosed diabetes had increased risk for CVD. Although A1C is more convenient than FPG in diagnosing diabetes, neither test adds to conventional CVD risk factors in predicting CHD or total CVD.OBJECTIVE: We compared A1C and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a population with widespread obesity and diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 4,549 American Indian adults underwent the Strong Heart Study (SHS) baseline examination (1989-1991). Data from 3,850 individuals (60% women) with baseline measurements of FPG and A1C and no prevalent CVD were analyzed; 1,386 had known diabetes. CVD events were ascertained over a median of 15 years.RESULTS: A1C >=6.5% had a 44.3% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity to identify participants with FPG >=126 mg/dL. Increases in A1C were associated with adverse CVD risk factor profiles; individuals with known diabetes had worse profiles. For A1C <5, 5 to <5.5, 5.5 to <6, 6-6.5, or >=6.5% or known diabetes, the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] for coronary heart disease (CHD) was significant only for individuals with known diabetes (2.76 [2.17-3.51]). Similarly, the adjusted HRs for total CVD were significant only for individuals with A1C >=6.5% or known diabetes (1.50 [1.10-2.04] and 2.52 [2.06-3.08], respectively). Similar results were observed for FPG.All authors: Calhoun D, de Simone G, Devereux R, Howard BV, Lee ET, Shara NM, Umans JG, Wang HFiscal year: FY2012Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2013-09-17
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 21788631 Available 21788631

Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006

CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with known or newly diagnosed diabetes had increased risk for CVD. Although A1C is more convenient than FPG in diagnosing diabetes, neither test adds to conventional CVD risk factors in predicting CHD or total CVD.

OBJECTIVE: We compared A1C and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a population with widespread obesity and diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 4,549 American Indian adults underwent the Strong Heart Study (SHS) baseline examination (1989-1991). Data from 3,850 individuals (60% women) with baseline measurements of FPG and A1C and no prevalent CVD were analyzed; 1,386 had known diabetes. CVD events were ascertained over a median of 15 years.

RESULTS: A1C >=6.5% had a 44.3% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity to identify participants with FPG >=126 mg/dL. Increases in A1C were associated with adverse CVD risk factor profiles; individuals with known diabetes had worse profiles. For A1C <5, 5 to <5.5, 5.5 to <6, 6-6.5, or >=6.5% or known diabetes, the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] for coronary heart disease (CHD) was significant only for individuals with known diabetes (2.76 [2.17-3.51]). Similarly, the adjusted HRs for total CVD were significant only for individuals with A1C >=6.5% or known diabetes (1.50 [1.10-2.04] and 2.52 [2.06-3.08], respectively). Similar results were observed for FPG.

English

Powered by Koha