Pelvic Organ Prolapse---Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh: The Evidence. [Review]
Citation: Obstetrics & Gynecology Clinics of North America. 43(1):83-92, 2016 Mar.PMID: 26880510Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Obstetrics and Gynecology/Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery | Obstetrics and Gynecology/UrogynecologyForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | ReviewSubject headings: *Pelvic Organ Prolapse/su [Surgery] | *Surgical Mesh | *Vagina/su [Surgery] | Female | Humans | Laparoscopy | Prosthesis Implantation | Robotic Surgical Procedures | Suburethral SlingsYear: 2016Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 1996 - presentISSN:- 0889-8545
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | MedStar Authors Catalog | Article | 26880510 | Available | 26880510 |
Available online from MWHC library: 1996 - present
This report summarizes the current literature on abdominal, laparoscopic, and transvaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. This article reviews objective and subjective cure rates as well as complications associated with synthetic mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse repair. The focus is on the latest literature that provides evidence for when synthetic mesh use is most appropriate. The use of mesh for the repair of urinary incontinence is not reviewed in this article. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
English