Role of CMR in TAVR. [Review]
Citation: Jacc: Cardiovascular Imaging. 9(5):593-602, 2016 MayPMID: 27151522Institution: MedStar Heart & Vascular InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | ReviewSubject headings: *Aortic Valve Stenosis/su [Surgery] | *Aortic Valve/su [Surgery] | *Magnetic Resonance Imaging | *Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement | Aortic Valve Stenosis/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] | Aortic Valve Stenosis/pp [Physiopathology] | Aortic Valve/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] | Aortic Valve/pp [Physiopathology] | Contrast Media/ad [Administration & Dosage] | Heart Valve Prosthesis | Humans | Patient Selection | Predictive Value of Tests | Prosthesis Design | Severity of Illness Index | Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/is [Instrumentation] | Treatment OutcomeYear: 2016ISSN:- 1876-7591
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | MedStar Authors Catalog | Article | 27151522 | Available | 27151522 |
Copyright � 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Multimodality imaging plays a critical role in planning, performing, and evaluating transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been underutilized in this patient population to date, but there is increasing evidence that it can offer equivalent or even superior information to more commonly used imaging modalities, such as echocardiography or computed tomography for specific applications. In addition, CMR can provide incremental information, including advanced tissue characterization with late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping. In this paper, we review the evidence for CMR in TAVR and explore whether CMR should still be considered a research tool, or whether it is now ready for implementation into clinical practice.
English