Synergy, Salary, and Satisfaction: Benefits of Training in Critical Care Medicine and Infectious Diseases Gleaned From a National Pilot Survey of Dually Trained Physicians.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Clinical Infectious Diseases. 63(7):868-75, 2016 Oct 01PMID: 27358351Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Medicine/General Internal MedicineForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Critical Care | *Infectious Disease Medicine | *Physicians | Adult | Cross-Sectional Studies | Female | Humans | Infectious Disease Medicine/ec [Economics] | Infectious Disease Medicine/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data] | Male | Middle Aged | Personal Satisfaction | Physicians/ec [Economics] | Physicians/px [Psychology] | Physicians/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data] | Surveys and Questionnaires | United StatesYear: 2016Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: June 1997 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - Winter 2007ISSN:
  • 1058-4838
Name of journal: Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaAbstract: CONCLUSIONS: CCM-ID graduates prefer the acute care setting, predominantly CCM or a combination of CCM and ID. They find combination training and practice to be synergistic and satisfying, but most have had to seek CCM and ID training independently at separate institutions. Given these findings, avenues for combined training in CCM-ID should be considered.Copyright Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.METHODS: All physicians trained and/or certified in both CCM and ID to date in the United States were sent a Web-based questionnaire in 2015. Responses enabled a cross-sectional analysis of physician demographics and training and practice characteristics and satisfaction.RESULTS: Of 202 CCM-ID physicians, 196 were alive and reachable. The response rate was 79%. Forty-six percent trained and 34% practice in the northeastern United States. Only 40% received dual training at the same institution. Eighty-three percent identified as either an intensivist with ID expertise (44%) or as equally an intensivist and ID physician (38%). Median salary was All authors: Cai R, Decker BK, Kadri SS, Magda G, O'Grady NP, Rhee C, Strich JR, Sun JFiscal year: FY2017Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2017-05-24
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 27358351 Available 27358351

Available online from MWHC library: June 1997 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - Winter 2007

CONCLUSIONS: CCM-ID graduates prefer the acute care setting, predominantly CCM or a combination of CCM and ID. They find combination training and practice to be synergistic and satisfying, but most have had to seek CCM and ID training independently at separate institutions. Given these findings, avenues for combined training in CCM-ID should be considered.

Copyright Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

METHODS: All physicians trained and/or certified in both CCM and ID to date in the United States were sent a Web-based questionnaire in 2015. Responses enabled a cross-sectional analysis of physician demographics and training and practice characteristics and satisfaction.

RESULTS: Of 202 CCM-ID physicians, 196 were alive and reachable. The response rate was 79%. Forty-six percent trained and 34% practice in the northeastern United States. Only 40% received dual training at the same institution. Eighty-three percent identified as either an intensivist with ID expertise (44%) or as equally an intensivist and ID physician (38%). Median salary was 65 000 (interquartile range [IQR], 15 000- 50 000). Practice settings were split between academic (45%) and community settings (42%). Two-thirds are clinicians but 62% conduct some research and 26% practice outpatient ID. Top reasons to dually specialize included clinical synergy (70%), procedural activity (50%), and less interest in pulmonology (49%). Although 38% cited less proficiency with bronchoscopy as a disadvantage, 87% seldom need pulmonary consultation in the intensive care unit. Median career satisfaction was 4 (IQR, 4-5) out of 5, and 76% would dually train again.

English

Powered by Koha