MedStar Authors catalog › Details for: Learning curves for transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: Technical performance, success, and safety.
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Learning curves for transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: Technical performance, success, and safety.

by Suri, Rakesh M; Waksman, Ron; Satler, Lowell F; Torguson, Rebecca; Pichard, Augusto D.
Citation: Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery. 152(3):773-780.e14, 2016 Sep.Journal: The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.Published: 2016ISSN: 0022-5223.Full author list: Suri RM; Minha S; Alli O; Waksman R; Rihal CS; Satler LP; Greason KL; Torguson R; Pichard AD; Mack M; Svensson LG; Rajeswaran J; Lowry AM; Ehrlinger J; Mick SL; Tuzcu EM; Thourani VH; Makkar R; Holmes D; Leon MB; Blackstone EH.UI/PMID: 27215927.Subject(s): Aged, 80 and over | *Aortic Valve Stenosis/su [Surgery] | *Clinical Competence | Female | Humans | *Learning Curve | Male | Operative Time | Patient Safety | Postoperative Complications | *Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/ed [Education] | *Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mt [Methods] | Treatment OutcomeInstitution(s): MedStar Heart & Vascular InstituteActivity type: Journal Article.Medline article type(s): Journal ArticleOnline resources: Click here to access online Digital Object Identifier: (Click here) Abbreviated citation: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 152(3):773-780.e14, 2016 Sep.Local Holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 1994 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006.Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Introduction of hybrid techniques, such as transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR), requires skills that a heart team must master to achieve technical efficiency: the technical performance learning curve. To date, the learning curve for TA-TAVR remains unknown. We therefore evaluated the rate at which technical performance improved, assessed change in occurrence of adverse events in relation to technical performance, and determined whether adverse events after TA-TAVR were linked to acquiring technical performance efficiency (the learning curve).Abstract: METHODS: From April 2007 to February 2012, 1100 patients, average age 85.0 +/- 6.4 years, underwent TA-TAVR in the PARTNER-I trial. Learning curves were defined by institution-specific patient sequence number using nonlinear mixed modeling.Abstract: RESULTS: Mean procedure time decreased from 131 to 116 minutes within 30 cases (P = .06) and device success increased to 90% by case 45 (P = .0007). Within 30 days, 354 patients experienced a major adverse event (stroke in 29, death in 96), with possibly decreased complications over time (P ~ .08). Although longer procedure time was associated with more adverse events (P < .0001), these events were associated with change in patient risk profile, not the technical performance learning curve (P = .8).Abstract: CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve for TA-TAVR was 30 to 45 procedures performed, and technical efficiency was achieved without compromising patient safety. Although fewer patients are now undergoing TAVR via nontransfemoral access, understanding TA-TAVR learning curves and their relationship with outcomes is important as the field moves toward next-generation devices, such as those to replace the mitral valve, delivered via the left ventricular apex.Abstract: Copyright � 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Powered by Koha