Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Utilization in Diabetics: Friend or Foe?.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2018 May 11PMID: 29758209Institution: MedStar Union Memorial HospitalDepartment: Division of Cardiac SurgeryForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXEDYear: 2018Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library:1999-2007ISSN:
  • 0003-4975
Name of journal: The Annals of thoracic surgeryAbstract: BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting in diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. Our study compared morbidity and mortality between 1)diabetic and non-diabetic BIMA patients and 2)diabetic BIMA versus diabetic patients who underwent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting only.CONCLUSIONS: In this statewide analysis, diabetics who received BIMA grafts (compared to diabetics with LIMA grafts or non-diabetics with BIMA grafts) had higher O/E ratios for composite morbidity/mortality as a result of higher O/E ratios for major complications.Copyright (c) 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.METHODS: Patients who underwent isolated CABG from July 2011 - June 2016 at any of the 10 centers in Maryland were propensity scored across 16 variables. Diabetic BIMA were matched 1:1 by nearest neighbor matching to non-diabetic BIMA patients, and were separately matched 1:1 to diabetic LIMA patients. We calculated observed to expected (O/E) ratios for composite morbidity/mortality, operative mortality, unplanned reoperation, stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and deep sternal wound infection) and compared ratios among matched populations.RESULTS: Over the study period, 812 CABG patients received BIMA grafts, including 302 patients (37%) with diabetes. We matched 259 diabetic and non-diabetic BIMA patients. O/E ratios were higher in matched diabetic (vs non-diabetic) BIMA patients when comparing composite morbidity/mortality, reoperation, stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation (all O/E>1.0), however, O/E for operative mortality was higher in non-diabetic BIMA patients. We additionally matched 292 diabetic BIMA to diabetic LIMA patients. Diabetic BIMA patients had a higher O/E for composite morbidity/mortality, operative mortality, stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation.All authors: Alejo D, Bobbitt J, Conte JV, Crawford TC, Fiocco M, Fonner CE, Fraser CD 3rd, Investigators for the Maryland Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative, Kwon C, Magruder JT, Salenger R, Suarez-Pierre A, Taylor B, Wehberg K, Whitman GJ, Zhou XFiscal year: FY2018Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2018-06-19
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 29758209 Available 29758209

Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library:1999-2007

BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting in diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. Our study compared morbidity and mortality between 1)diabetic and non-diabetic BIMA patients and 2)diabetic BIMA versus diabetic patients who underwent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting only.

CONCLUSIONS: In this statewide analysis, diabetics who received BIMA grafts (compared to diabetics with LIMA grafts or non-diabetics with BIMA grafts) had higher O/E ratios for composite morbidity/mortality as a result of higher O/E ratios for major complications.

Copyright (c) 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

METHODS: Patients who underwent isolated CABG from July 2011 - June 2016 at any of the 10 centers in Maryland were propensity scored across 16 variables. Diabetic BIMA were matched 1:1 by nearest neighbor matching to non-diabetic BIMA patients, and were separately matched 1:1 to diabetic LIMA patients. We calculated observed to expected (O/E) ratios for composite morbidity/mortality, operative mortality, unplanned reoperation, stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and deep sternal wound infection) and compared ratios among matched populations.

RESULTS: Over the study period, 812 CABG patients received BIMA grafts, including 302 patients (37%) with diabetes. We matched 259 diabetic and non-diabetic BIMA patients. O/E ratios were higher in matched diabetic (vs non-diabetic) BIMA patients when comparing composite morbidity/mortality, reoperation, stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation (all O/E>1.0), however, O/E for operative mortality was higher in non-diabetic BIMA patients. We additionally matched 292 diabetic BIMA to diabetic LIMA patients. Diabetic BIMA patients had a higher O/E for composite morbidity/mortality, operative mortality, stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation.

English

Powered by Koha