Intratumoral Heterogeneity Accounts for Apparent Progression of Noninvasive Serous Tumors to Invasive Low-grade Serous Carcinoma: A Study of 30 Low-grade Serous Tumors of the Ovary in 18 Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 39(1):43-54, 2020 Jan.PMID: 30480646Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: PathologyForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Cystadenoma, Serous/ge [Genetics] | *Cystadenoma, Serous/sc [Secondary] | *Ovarian Neoplasms/ge [Genetics] | *Ovarian Neoplasms/pa [Pathology] | *Peritoneal Neoplasms/ge [Genetics] | *Peritoneal Neoplasms/sc [Secondary] | Adult | Aged | Biopsy | Disease Progression | Female | Genetic Heterogeneity | Humans | Middle Aged | Neoplasm Grading | Neoplasm Invasiveness | Neoplasm StagingYear: 2020Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 2000 - presentISSN:
  • 0277-1691
Name of journal: International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological PathologistsAbstract: Noninvasive ovarian low-grade serous tumors [atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST)/serous borderline tumor] appear to progress to invasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) at a low but regular rate. The underlying biology of this phenomenon is unknown. We studied 18 patients with 30 ovarian tumors (12 bilateral), including APST, noninvasive LGSC and invasive LGSC, who also had low-grade serous carcinomatosis. Tumors were evaluated for microinvasion (usual eosinophilic cell type), microinvasive carcinoma (<5 mm invasion of micropapillary nests), and overt carcinoma (>=5 mm invasion of micropapillary nests). Tumors were evaluated based on the original numerical order of sections under the hypothetical scenarios in which sampling was stopped at 1 section/cm and 2 sections/cm. Sampling based on 1 section/cm of greatest tumor dimension identified invasion of any type in 21 tumors (70%). Among these 21 tumors, 10 had microinvasive carcinoma, and 11 overt carcinoma. Sampling based on 2 sections/cm identified microinvasive carcinoma in 9 tumors and overt carcinoma in 14 tumors. With increased sampling from 1 to 2 sections/cm, the diagnosis in 3 tumors would have changed from microinvasive carcinoma to overt carcinoma, and in an additional 2 tumors from APST to APST with microinvasive carcinoma. Sampling based on >2 sections/cm changed the diagnosis in 1 additional case of APST with microinvasive carcinoma to overt carcinoma. These findings support that undetected (unsampled) occult invasion in the primary ovarian tumors is a likely explanation for some cases of apparent progression of noninvasive low-grade serous ovarian tumors to invasive LGSC. To minimize undetected occult invasion, consideration of sampling noninvasive low-grade ovarian serous tumors with at least 2 sections/cm of maximum tumor diameter may be warranted. The eosinophilic cell type of microinvasion, or microinvasive carcinoma, regardless of size, should prompt further sampling to identify overt carcinoma. The eosinophilic type of microinvasion was never seen alone in this cohort and by itself may be biologically insignificant.All authors: Krishnan J, Kurman RJ, Savage J, Seidman JD, Vang ROriginally published: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2018 Nov 21Fiscal year: FY2020Fiscal year of original publication: FY2019Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2018-12-14
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 30480646 Available 30480646

Available online from MWHC library: 2000 - present

Noninvasive ovarian low-grade serous tumors [atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST)/serous borderline tumor] appear to progress to invasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) at a low but regular rate. The underlying biology of this phenomenon is unknown. We studied 18 patients with 30 ovarian tumors (12 bilateral), including APST, noninvasive LGSC and invasive LGSC, who also had low-grade serous carcinomatosis. Tumors were evaluated for microinvasion (usual eosinophilic cell type), microinvasive carcinoma (<5 mm invasion of micropapillary nests), and overt carcinoma (>=5 mm invasion of micropapillary nests). Tumors were evaluated based on the original numerical order of sections under the hypothetical scenarios in which sampling was stopped at 1 section/cm and 2 sections/cm. Sampling based on 1 section/cm of greatest tumor dimension identified invasion of any type in 21 tumors (70%). Among these 21 tumors, 10 had microinvasive carcinoma, and 11 overt carcinoma. Sampling based on 2 sections/cm identified microinvasive carcinoma in 9 tumors and overt carcinoma in 14 tumors. With increased sampling from 1 to 2 sections/cm, the diagnosis in 3 tumors would have changed from microinvasive carcinoma to overt carcinoma, and in an additional 2 tumors from APST to APST with microinvasive carcinoma. Sampling based on >2 sections/cm changed the diagnosis in 1 additional case of APST with microinvasive carcinoma to overt carcinoma. These findings support that undetected (unsampled) occult invasion in the primary ovarian tumors is a likely explanation for some cases of apparent progression of noninvasive low-grade serous ovarian tumors to invasive LGSC. To minimize undetected occult invasion, consideration of sampling noninvasive low-grade ovarian serous tumors with at least 2 sections/cm of maximum tumor diameter may be warranted. The eosinophilic cell type of microinvasion, or microinvasive carcinoma, regardless of size, should prompt further sampling to identify overt carcinoma. The eosinophilic type of microinvasion was never seen alone in this cohort and by itself may be biologically insignificant.

English

Powered by Koha