Personalizing initial therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: incorporating novel agents into clinical practice. [Review]

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology. 9(5):109-121, 2018 May.PMID: 29713444Institution: Washington Cancer InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | ReviewYear: 2018ISSN:
  • 2040-6207
Name of journal: Therapeutic advances in hematologyAbstract: While the past decade has seen a revolution in understanding of the genetic and molecular etiology of the disease, in clinical practice, initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has been a relatively straightforward choice between intensive combination cytotoxic induction therapy as used for decades or less-intensive hypomethylating therapy. The year 2017, however, witnessed US Food and Drug Administration approvals of midostaurin, enasidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin and CPX-351 for AML patients, with many other promising agents currently in clinical trials. This review discusses these options, highlights unanswered questions regarding optimal combinations and proposes some suggested approaches for the personalization of initial therapy for AML patients.All authors: DeStefano CB, Hourigan CSFiscal year: FY2018Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2022-12-13
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 29713444 Available 29713444

While the past decade has seen a revolution in understanding of the genetic and molecular etiology of the disease, in clinical practice, initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has been a relatively straightforward choice between intensive combination cytotoxic induction therapy as used for decades or less-intensive hypomethylating therapy. The year 2017, however, witnessed US Food and Drug Administration approvals of midostaurin, enasidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin and CPX-351 for AML patients, with many other promising agents currently in clinical trials. This review discusses these options, highlights unanswered questions regarding optimal combinations and proposes some suggested approaches for the personalization of initial therapy for AML patients.

English

Powered by Koha