Guidelines for balancing priorities in structural heart disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. [Review]

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 21(8):1030-1033, 2020 08.PMID: 32736981Institution: MedStar Heart & Vascular InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | ReviewSubject headings: *Betacoronavirus | *Cardiology/st [Standards] | *Coronavirus Infections/ep [Epidemiology] | *Disease Management | *Heart Diseases/th [Therapy] | *Pandemics | *Pneumonia, Viral/ep [Epidemiology] | *Practice Guidelines as Topic | *Societies, Medical | Comorbidity | Global Health | Heart Diseases/ep [Epidemiology] | HumansYear: 2020ISSN:
  • 1878-0938
Name of journal: Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventionsAbstract: During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many hospitals have been asked to postpone elective and surgical cases. This begs the question, "What is elective in structural heart disease intervention?" The recently proposed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions/American College of Cardiology consensus statement is, unfortunately, non-specific and insufficient in its scope and scale of response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We propose guidelines that are practical, multidisciplinary, implementable, and urgent. We believe that this will provide a helpful framework for our colleagues to manage their practice during the surge and peak phases of the pandemic. General principles that apply across structural heart disease interventions include tracking and reporting cardiovascular outcomes, "healthcare distancing," preserving vital resources and personnel, shared decision-making between the heart team and hospital administration on resource-intensive cases, and considering delaying research cases. Specific guidance for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and MitraClip procedures varies according to pandemic phase. During the surge phase, treatment should broadly be limited to those at increased risk of complications in the near term. During the peak phase, treatment should be limited to inpatients for whom it may facilitate discharge. Keeping our patients and ourselves safe is paramount, as well as justly rationing resources. Copyright (c) 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.All authors: Case BC, Chezar-Azerrad C, Forrestal BJ, Khalid N, Khan JM, Musallam A, Rogers T, Shlofmitz E, Waksman R, Yerasi COriginally published: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2020 May 30Fiscal year: FY2021Fiscal year of original publication: FY2020Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2020-09-02
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 32736981 Available 32736981

During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many hospitals have been asked to postpone elective and surgical cases. This begs the question, "What is elective in structural heart disease intervention?" The recently proposed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions/American College of Cardiology consensus statement is, unfortunately, non-specific and insufficient in its scope and scale of response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We propose guidelines that are practical, multidisciplinary, implementable, and urgent. We believe that this will provide a helpful framework for our colleagues to manage their practice during the surge and peak phases of the pandemic. General principles that apply across structural heart disease interventions include tracking and reporting cardiovascular outcomes, "healthcare distancing," preserving vital resources and personnel, shared decision-making between the heart team and hospital administration on resource-intensive cases, and considering delaying research cases. Specific guidance for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and MitraClip procedures varies according to pandemic phase. During the surge phase, treatment should broadly be limited to those at increased risk of complications in the near term. During the peak phase, treatment should be limited to inpatients for whom it may facilitate discharge. Keeping our patients and ourselves safe is paramount, as well as justly rationing resources. Copyright (c) 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

English

Powered by Koha