Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Association between long interpregnancy intervals and cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders.

MedStar author(s):

Citation: American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 2(3):100103, 2020 08.PMID: 33345862Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Obstetrics and Gynecology/Maternal-Fetal MedicineForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXEDYear: 2020 ISSN:

2589-9333

Name of journal: American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFMAbstract: BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that pregnancy causes time-limited physiologic adaptations of the reproductive system, such as increased blood flow to the uterus. With long interpregnancy intervals, those adaptations may regress, and maternal physiologic characteristics may revert to those of primigravid women. Therefore, it is plausible that long interpregnancy interval is associated with cesarean delivery, especially due to arrest disorders (failed induction of labor, arrest of dilation, or arrest of descent).CONCLUSION: An interpregnancy interval of 60 months or greater compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18-59 months was associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders. Beneficial effects on postpartum adaptations in the reproductive system may regress as interpregnancy interval increases. Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women who had more than 1 singleton pregnancy at 23 weeks' gestation or greater at MedStar Washington Hospital Center from January 2009 to June 2018. We defined the interpregnancy interval as the duration from the birth of the preceding offspring to the date of conception of the index offspring. We a priori decided to categorize women based on the interpregnancy interval (less than 18 months, 18-59 months, and 60 months or greater). Our primary outcome was cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders. We also examined overall cesarean delivery and cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart tracing. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, controlling for predefined covariates.OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between interpregnancy interval and cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders in multiparous women without a history of cesarean delivery.RESULTS: Of 2741 women, 1143 (41.7%), 1369 (49.9%), and 229 (8.4%) had an interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months, 18-59 months, and 60 months or more, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, an interpregnancy interval of 60 months or more compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18-59 months was associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders (4.8% vs 1.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-6.97) and cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation (3.1% vs 0.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-9.59). An interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18-59 months was associated with decreased odds of cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart tracing (2.4% vs 4.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.92).All authors: Franco S, Ghofranian A, Kawakita T, Landy HJ, Thomas AFiscal year: FY2021Digital Object Identifier:

https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100103

Date added to catalog: 2020-12-31

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 6 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Journal Article	MedStar Authors Catalog	Article	33345862	Available		33345862

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that pregnancy causes time-limited physiologic adaptations of the reproductive system, such as increased blood flow to the uterus. With long interpregnancy intervals, those adaptations may regress, and maternal physiologic characteristics may revert to those of primigravid women. Therefore, it is plausible that long interpregnancy interval is associated with cesarean delivery, especially due to arrest disorders (failed induction of labor, arrest of dilation, or arrest of descent).

CONCLUSION: An interpregnancy interval of 60 months or greater compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18-59 months was associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders. Beneficial effects on postpartum adaptations in the reproductive system may regress as interpregnancy interval increases. Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women who had more than 1 singleton pregnancy at 23 weeks' gestation or greater at MedStar Washington Hospital Center from January 2009 to June 2018. We defined the interpregnancy interval as the duration from the birth of the preceding offspring to the date of conception of the index offspring. We a priori decided to categorize women based on the interpregnancy interval (less than 18 months, 18-59 months, and 60 months or greater). Our primary outcome was cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders. We also examined overall cesarean delivery and cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart tracing. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, controlling for predefined covariates.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between interpregnancy interval and cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders in multiparous women without a history of cesarean delivery.

RESULTS: Of 2741 women, 1143 (41.7%), 1369 (49.9%), and 229 (8.4%) had an interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months, 18-59 months, and 60 months or more, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, an interpregnancy interval of 60 months or more compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18-59 months was associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders (4.8% vs 1.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-6.97) and cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation (3.1% vs 0.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-9.59). An interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18-59 months was associated with decreased odds of cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart tracing (2.4% vs 4.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.92).

English