Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Tele-rehabilitation of upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke: Proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial of in-home Constraint-Induced Movement therapy.

MedStar author(s):

0922-6028

Name of journal: Restorative neurology and neuroscienceAbstract: BACKGROUND: Although Constraint-Induced Movement therapy (CIMT) has been deemed efficacious for adults with persistent, mild-to-moderate, post-stroke upper-extremity hemiparesis, CIMT is not available on a widespread clinical basis. Impediments include its cost and travel to multiple therapy appointments. To overcome these barriers, we developed an automated, tele-health form of CIMT.CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study suggests that Tele-AutoCITE produces immediate benefits that are equivalent to those after in-lab CIMT in stroke survivors with chronic upper-arm extremity hemiparesis. Cost savings possible with this tele-health approach remain to be evaluated.METHODS: Twenty-four stroke patients with chronic upper-arm extremity hemiparesis were randomly assigned to tele-health CIMT (Tele-AutoCITE) or in-lab CIMT. All received 35 hours of treatment. In the tele-health group, an automated, upper-extremity workstation with built-in sensors and video cameras was set-up in participants' homes. Internet-based audio-visual and data links permitted supervision of treatment by a trainer in the lab.OBJECTIVE: Determine whether in-home, tele-health CIMT has outcomes as good as in-clinic, face-to-face CIMT in adults >=1-year post-stroke with mild-to-moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis.RESULTS: Ten patients in each group completed treatment. All twenty, on average, showed very large improvements immediately afterwards in everyday use of the more-affected arm (mean change on Motor Activity Log Arm Use scale = 2.5 points, p < 0.001, d' = 3.1). After one-year, a large improvement from baseline was still present (mean change = 1.8, p < 0.001, d' = 2). Post-treatment outcomes in the tele-health group were not inferior to those in the in-lab group. Neither were participants' perceptions of satisfaction with and difficulty of the interventions. Although everyday arm use was similar in the two groups after one-year (mean difference = -0.1, 95% CI = -1.3-1.0), reductions in the precision of the estimates of this parameter due to drop-out over follow-up did not permit ruling out that the tele-health group had an inferior long-term outcome.All authors: Barman J, Bowman MH, Brennan D, Lum P, Mark VW, McKay S, Morris DM, Sloman SB, Taub E, Taylor A, Uswatte GOriginally published: Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience. 39(4):303-318, 2021.Fiscal year: FY2022Digital Object Identifier:

https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-201100

Date added to catalog: 2021-11-01

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 6 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Journal Article	MedStar Authors Catalog	Article	34459426	Available		34459426

BACKGROUND: Although Constraint-Induced Movement therapy (CIMT) has been deemed efficacious for adults with persistent, mild-to-moderate, post-stroke upper-extremity hemiparesis, CIMT is not available on a widespread clinical basis. Impediments include its cost and travel to multiple therapy appointments. To overcome these barriers, we developed an automated, tele-health form of CIMT.

CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study suggests that Tele-AutoCITE produces immediate benefits that are equivalent to those after in-lab CIMT in stroke survivors with chronic upper-arm extremity hemiparesis. Cost savings possible with this tele-health approach remain to be evaluated.

METHODS: Twenty-four stroke patients with chronic upper-arm extremity hemiparesis were randomly assigned to tele-health CIMT (Tele-AutoCITE) or in-lab CIMT. All received 35 hours of treatment. In the tele-health group, an automated, upper-extremity workstation with built-in sensors and video cameras was set-up in participants' homes. Internet-based audio-visual and data links permitted supervision of treatment by a trainer in the lab.

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether in-home, tele-health CIMT has outcomes as good as in-clinic, face-to-face CIMT in adults >=1-year post-stroke with mild-to-moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis.

RESULTS: Ten patients in each group completed treatment. All twenty, on average, showed very large improvements immediately afterwards in everyday use of the more-affected arm (mean change on Motor Activity Log Arm Use scale = 2.5 points, p < 0.001, d' = 3.1). After one-year, a large improvement from baseline was still present (mean change = 1.8, p < 0.001, d' = 2). Post-treatment outcomes in the tele-health group were not inferior to those in the in-lab group. Neither were participants' perceptions of satisfaction with and difficulty of the interventions. Although everyday arm use was similar in the two groups after one-year (mean difference = -0.1, 95% CI = -1.3-1.0), reductions in the precision of the estimates of this parameter due to drop-out over follow-up did not permit ruling out that the tele-health group had an inferior long-term outcome.

English