Normal Values of Aortic Root Size According to Age, Sex, and Race: Results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Study.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 35(3):267-274, 2022 03.PMID: 34619294Institution: MedStar Health Research Institute | MedStar Heart & Vascular InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Aorta | *Echocardiography | Adolescent | Adult | Aged | Aorta/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] | Female | Humans | Male | Middle Aged | Racial Groups | Reference Values | Whites | Young AdultYear: 2022Local holdings: Available online through MWHC library: 2007 - presentName of journal: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of EchocardiographyAbstract: BACKGROUND: Accurate measurements of the aortic annulus and root are important for guiding therapeutic decisions regarding the need for aortic surgery. Current echocardiographic guidelines for identification of aortic root dilatation are limited because current normative values were derived predominantly from white individuals in narrow age ranges, and based partially on M-mode measurements. Using data from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography study, the authors sought to establish normal ranges of aortic dimensions across sexes, races, and a wide range of ages.CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in aortic dimensions according to sex, age, and race. Thus, current guideline-recommended normal ranges may need to be adjusted to account for these differences. Copyright (c) 2021 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.METHODS: Adult individuals free of heart, lung, and kidney disease were prospectively enrolled from 15 countries, with even distributions among sexes and age groups: young (18-40 years), middle aged (41-65 years) and old (>65 years). Transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiograms of 1,585 subjects (mean age, 47 +/- 17 years; 50.4% men; mean body surface area [BSA], 1.77 +/- 0.22 m2) were analyzed in a core laboratory following American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Measurements, indexed separately by BSA and by height, included the aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction. Differences among age, sex, and racial groups were evaluated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t tests.RESULTS: All aortic root dimensions were larger in men compared with women. After indexing to BSA, all measured dimensions were significantly larger in women, whereas men continued to show larger dimensions after indexing to height. Of note, the upper limits of normal for all aortic dimensions were lower across all age groups, compared with the guidelines. Aortic dimensions were larger in older age groups in both sexes, a trend that persisted regardless of BSA or height adjustment. Last, differences in aortic dimensions were also observed according to race: Asians had the smallest nonindexed aortic dimensions at all levels.All authors: Addetia K, Amuthan V, Asch FM, Blankenhagen M, Citro R, Daimon M, Degel M, Gutierrez Fajardo P, Hitschrich N, Kasliwal RR, Kirkpatrick JN, Lang RM, Miyoshi T, Monaghan MJ, Mor-Avi V, Muraru D, Ogunyankin KO, Park SW, Patel HN, Ronderos RE, Sadeghpour A, Scalia GM, Schreckenberg M, Takeuchi M, Tsang W, Tucay ES, Tude Rodrigues AC, WASE Investigators, Zhang YOriginally published: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2021 Oct 04Fiscal year: FY2022Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2022-02-22
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 34619294 Available 34619294

Available online through MWHC library: 2007 - present

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurements of the aortic annulus and root are important for guiding therapeutic decisions regarding the need for aortic surgery. Current echocardiographic guidelines for identification of aortic root dilatation are limited because current normative values were derived predominantly from white individuals in narrow age ranges, and based partially on M-mode measurements. Using data from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography study, the authors sought to establish normal ranges of aortic dimensions across sexes, races, and a wide range of ages.

CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in aortic dimensions according to sex, age, and race. Thus, current guideline-recommended normal ranges may need to be adjusted to account for these differences. Copyright (c) 2021 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

METHODS: Adult individuals free of heart, lung, and kidney disease were prospectively enrolled from 15 countries, with even distributions among sexes and age groups: young (18-40 years), middle aged (41-65 years) and old (>65 years). Transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiograms of 1,585 subjects (mean age, 47 +/- 17 years; 50.4% men; mean body surface area [BSA], 1.77 +/- 0.22 m2) were analyzed in a core laboratory following American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Measurements, indexed separately by BSA and by height, included the aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction. Differences among age, sex, and racial groups were evaluated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t tests.

RESULTS: All aortic root dimensions were larger in men compared with women. After indexing to BSA, all measured dimensions were significantly larger in women, whereas men continued to show larger dimensions after indexing to height. Of note, the upper limits of normal for all aortic dimensions were lower across all age groups, compared with the guidelines. Aortic dimensions were larger in older age groups in both sexes, a trend that persisted regardless of BSA or height adjustment. Last, differences in aortic dimensions were also observed according to race: Asians had the smallest nonindexed aortic dimensions at all levels.

English

Powered by Koha