Vascular Anatomy of the Anteromedial Thigh Flap: A Systematic Review.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 10(10):e4546, 2022 Oct.PMID: 36299817Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: MedStar General Surgery Residency | MedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Plastic Surgery Residency | Surgery/Plastic SurgeryForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXEDYear: 2022ISSN:
  • 2169-7574
Name of journal: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global openAbstract: Conclusions: The variable vascular anatomy of the AMT flap has prevented its widespread adoption in reconstruction. As knowledge regarding pertinent perforator anatomy of the AMT flap increases, so may its utility as an alternative to the ALT flap. This review summarizes the spectrum of anatomy of the AMT vasculature described in the literature to date. Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using Medical Subject Heading terms such as "anteromedial thigh flap" and "free tissue transfer." Study characteristics and anatomic descriptors (including number and type of perforators, origin, and pedicle course supplying the AMT flap) were collected.Results: A total of 21 studies representing 723 AMT flaps were identified and included for analysis. Dominant perforators supplying the AMT flap most commonly included the descending lateral circumflex femoral artery (dLCFA; 35%) or the medial branch of the dLCFA (mdLCFA; 33.6%). Average pedicle length ranged from 7.5 to 10.6cm. The majority of AMT perforators were septocutaneous (n = 852, 63.8%) compared with musculocutaneous (n = 483, 36.2%). Perforators to the AMT were absent in 7.6 to 9.1% of clinical cases.While the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is the most commonly employed thigh-based flap for microvascular reconstruction, its counterpart, the anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap, is a useful but underdescribed alternative when ALT perforators are absent or lacking. This review aims to assess the existing literature describing the anatomy and vascular territories supplying the AMT flap.All authors: Abu El Hawa AA, Attinger CE, Bekeny JC, Deldar R, Evans KK, Fan KL, Huffman SS, Sayyed AAFiscal year: FY2023Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2022-12-13
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 36299817 Available 36299817

Conclusions: The variable vascular anatomy of the AMT flap has prevented its widespread adoption in reconstruction. As knowledge regarding pertinent perforator anatomy of the AMT flap increases, so may its utility as an alternative to the ALT flap. This review summarizes the spectrum of anatomy of the AMT vasculature described in the literature to date. Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using Medical Subject Heading terms such as "anteromedial thigh flap" and "free tissue transfer." Study characteristics and anatomic descriptors (including number and type of perforators, origin, and pedicle course supplying the AMT flap) were collected.

Results: A total of 21 studies representing 723 AMT flaps were identified and included for analysis. Dominant perforators supplying the AMT flap most commonly included the descending lateral circumflex femoral artery (dLCFA; 35%) or the medial branch of the dLCFA (mdLCFA; 33.6%). Average pedicle length ranged from 7.5 to 10.6cm. The majority of AMT perforators were septocutaneous (n = 852, 63.8%) compared with musculocutaneous (n = 483, 36.2%). Perforators to the AMT were absent in 7.6 to 9.1% of clinical cases.

While the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is the most commonly employed thigh-based flap for microvascular reconstruction, its counterpart, the anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap, is a useful but underdescribed alternative when ALT perforators are absent or lacking. This review aims to assess the existing literature describing the anatomy and vascular territories supplying the AMT flap.

English

Powered by Koha