TY  - BOOK
AU  - Simprini, Lauren A
AU  - Taylor, Allen J
AU  - Utsunomiya, Daisuke
AU  - Weigold, William Guy
AU  - Weissman, Gaby
TI  - Prospective evaluation of the updated 2010 ACCF Cardiac CT Appropriate Use Criteria
SN  - 1876-861X
PY  - 2012///
KW  - *Coronary Angiography/mt [Methods]
KW  - *Coronary Artery Disease/ra [Radiography]
KW  - *Physician's Practice Patterns
KW  - *Tomography, X-Ray Computed
KW  - Adult
KW  - Aged
KW  - Chi-Square Distribution
KW  - Coronary Angiography/st [Standards]
KW  - District of Columbia
KW  - Female
KW  - Guideline Adherence
KW  - Humans
KW  - Male
KW  - Middle Aged
KW  - Patient Selection
KW  - Physician's Practice Patterns/st [Standards]
KW  - Practice Guidelines as Topic
KW  - Predictive Value of Tests
KW  - Prognosis
KW  - Prospective Studies
KW  - Referral and Consultation
KW  - Severity of Illness Index
KW  - Time Factors
KW  - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/st [Standards]
KW  - Unnecessary Procedures
KW  - MedStar Health Research Institute
KW  - MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute
KW  - Evaluation Studies
KW  - Journal Article
N2  - BACKGROUND: The cardiac CT Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) were updated in 2010 to reflect technical advances, evolving expert consensus, and rapidly expanding clinical evidence; CONCLUSION: The 2010 cardiac CT AUC update lead to more complete classification and to large shifts in the appropriateness ratings, underscoring the importance of ensuring the periodic revision of AUCs for evolving imaging technologies such that they perform optimally as quality measurement and reimbursement tools. Copyright A 2012 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved; METHODS: The 2006 and 2010 criteria were prospectively applied at the point of service to a consecutive series of patients referred for CTA at a single center (n = 1216). Patient interview and review of available health records were used to determine the CTA indication. The proportions of patients within categories of appropriate (A), uncertain (U), inappropriate (I), and not covered were described and compared between the 2006 and 2010 criteria; OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of the AUC update on their clinical performance, including the completeness and distribution of appropriateness ratings and test outcomes among a consecutive series of patients referred for CT angiography (CTA); RESULTS: The 2010 criteria significantly reduced the proportion of uncertain (30.5%-11.4%), inappropriate (16.0%-12.9%), and no covered (12.1%-4.7%; P < 0.001) indications, while increasing the proportion of appropriate tests from 41.4% to 71%. By the 2010 criteria, appropriate indications were more likely to lead to the detection of coronary artery stenosis (11.5% vs 6.7%; P = 0.03) and complete examinations (95.0% vs 90.8%; P = 0.03)
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2012.02.003
ER  -