TY - BOOK AU - Aroda, Vanita R TI - Establishing an electronic health record-supported approach for outreach to and recruitment of persons at high risk of type 2 diabetes in clinical trials: The vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study experience SN - 1740-7745 PY - 2019/// KW - *Cholecalciferol/tu [Therapeutic Use] KW - *Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pc [Prevention & Control] KW - *Electronic Health Records/og [Organization & Administration] KW - *Patient Selection KW - *Prediabetic State/dt [Drug Therapy] KW - Aged KW - Blood Glucose KW - Cholecalciferol/ad [Administration & Dosage] KW - Comorbidity KW - Dietary Supplements KW - Double-Blind Method KW - Glycated Hemoglobin A KW - Humans KW - Middle Aged KW - Research Design KW - MedStar Health Research Institute KW - Journal Article N2 - AIMS: To establish recruitment approaches that leverage electronic health records in multicenter prediabetes/diabetes clinical trials and compare recruitment outcomes between electronic health record-supported and conventional recruitment methods; CONCLUSION: Establishing electronic health record-supported recruitment approaches across a multicenter prediabetes/diabetes trial is feasible and can be adopted by diverse clinical environments; METHODS: Observational analysis of recruitment approaches in the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study, a multicenter trial in participants with prediabetes. Outcomes were adoption of electronic health record-supported recruitment approaches by sites, number of participants screened, recruitment performance (proportion screened who were randomized), and characteristics of participants from electronic health record-supported versus non-electronic health record methods; RESULTS: In total, 2423 participants were randomized: 1920 from electronic health record (mean age of 60 years, 41% women, 68% White) and 503 from non-electronic health record sources (mean age of 56.9 years, 58% women, 61% White). Electronic health record-supported recruitment was adopted by 21 of 22 sites. Electronic health record-supported recruitment was associated with more participants screened versus non-electronic health record methods (4969 vs 2166 participants screened), higher performance (38.6% vs 22.7%), and more randomizations (1918 vs 505). Participants recruited via electronic health record were older, included fewer women and minorities, and reported higher use of dietary supplements. Electronic health record-supported recruitment was incorporated in diverse clinical environments, engaging clinicians either at the individual or the healthcare system level UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774519839062 ER -