Durability and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses. - 2019

Available online from MWHC library: 2008 - present

BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an option when a surgical valve demonstrates deterioration and dysfunction. This study reports 3-year results following valve-in-valve with self-expanding TAVR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01675440. CONCLUSIONS: Self-expanding TAVR in patients with failed surgical bioprostheses at extreme risk for surgery was associated with durable hemodynamics and excellent clinical outcomes. Preexisting surgical valve prosthesis-patient mismatch was not associated with mortality but did limit patient improvement in quality of life over 3-year follow-up. METHODS: The CoreValve US Expanded Use Study is a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm study that evaluates safety and effectiveness of TAVR in extreme risk patients with symptomatic failed surgical biologic aortic valves. Study end points include all-cause mortality, need for valve reintervention, hemodynamic changes over time, and quality of life through 3 years. Patients were stratified by presence of preexisting surgical valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. RESULTS: From March 2013 to May 2015, 226 patients deemed extreme risk (STS-PROM [Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality] 9.0+/-7%) had attempted valve-in-valve TAVR. Preexisting surgical valve prosthesis-patient mismatch was present in 47.2% of the cohort. At 3 years, all-cause mortality or major stroke was 28.6%, and 93% of patients were in New York Heart Association I or II heart failure. Valve performance was maintained over 3 years with low valve reintervention rates (4.4%), an improvement in effective orifice area over time and a 2.7% rate of severe structural valve deterioration. Preexisting severe prosthesis-patient mismatch was not associated with 3-year mortality but was associated with significantly less improvement in quality of life at 3-year follow-up (P=0.01).


English

1941-7640

10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008155 [doi]


*Aortic Valve Stenosis/su [Surgery]
*Aortic Valve/su [Surgery]
*Heart Valve Prosthesis
*Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/is [Instrumentation]
*Prosthesis Failure
*Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/is [Instrumentation]
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve Stenosis/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
Aortic Valve Stenosis/mo [Mortality]
Aortic Valve Stenosis/pp [Physiopathology]
Aortic Valve/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
Aortic Valve/pp [Physiopathology]
Bioprosthesis
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/ae [Adverse Effects]
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mo [Mortality]
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/ae [Adverse Effects]
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mo [Mortality]
Treatment Outcome


MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute


Journal Article