Influence of pharmaceutical marketing on Medicare prescriptions in the District of Columbia.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: PLoS ONE [Electronic Resource]. 12(10):e0186060, 2017PMID: 29069085Institution: MedStar HealthDepartment: Regional PlanningForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Drug Industry/og [Organization & Administration] | *Marketing of Health Services | *Prescription Drugs/tu [Therapeutic Use] | Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.) | District of Columbia | Medicare Part D | United StatesYear: 2017Local holdings: Available online through MWHC library: 2006 - presentISSN:
  • 1932-6203
Name of journal: PloS oneAbstract: CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Gifts from pharmaceutical companies are associated with more prescriptions per patient, more costly prescriptions, and a higher proportion of branded prescriptions with variation across specialties. Gifts of any size had an effect and larger gifts elicited a larger impact on prescribing behaviors. Our study confirms and expands on previous work showing that industry gifts are associated with more expensive prescriptions and more branded prescriptions. Industry gifts influence prescribing behavior, may have adverse public health implications, and should be banned.DESIGN: Gifts data from the District of Columbia's (DC) AccessRx program and the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments program were analyzed with claims data from the CMS 2013 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data.EXPOSURE(S): Gifts to healthcare prescribers (including cash, meals, and ownership interests) from pharmaceutical companies.IMPORTANCE: Gifts from pharmaceutical companies are believed to influence prescribing behavior, but few studies have addressed the association between industry gifts to physicians and drug costs, prescription volume, or preference for generic drugs. Even less research addresses the effect of gifts on the prescribing behavior of nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and podiatrists.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Average number of Medicare Part D claims per prescriber, number of claims per patient, cost per claim, and proportion of branded claims.OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between gifts provided by pharmaceutical companies to individual prescribers in Washington DC and the number of prescriptions, cost of prescriptions, and proportion of branded prescriptions for each prescriber.PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, podiatrists, and other licensed Medicare Part D prescribers who participated in Medicare Part D (a Federal prescription drug program that covers patients over age 65 or who are disabled).RESULTS: In 2013, 1,122 (39.1%) of 2,873 Medicare Part D prescribers received gifts from pharmaceutical companies totaling SETTING: Washington DC, 2013.All authors: Bysshe T, Fugh-Berman A, Hogenmiller A, McMonagle MA, Podrasky J, Raveendran J, Wood SFFiscal year: FY2018Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2017-11-10
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 29069085 Available 29069085

Available online through MWHC library: 2006 - present

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Gifts from pharmaceutical companies are associated with more prescriptions per patient, more costly prescriptions, and a higher proportion of branded prescriptions with variation across specialties. Gifts of any size had an effect and larger gifts elicited a larger impact on prescribing behaviors. Our study confirms and expands on previous work showing that industry gifts are associated with more expensive prescriptions and more branded prescriptions. Industry gifts influence prescribing behavior, may have adverse public health implications, and should be banned.

DESIGN: Gifts data from the District of Columbia's (DC) AccessRx program and the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments program were analyzed with claims data from the CMS 2013 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data.

EXPOSURE(S): Gifts to healthcare prescribers (including cash, meals, and ownership interests) from pharmaceutical companies.

IMPORTANCE: Gifts from pharmaceutical companies are believed to influence prescribing behavior, but few studies have addressed the association between industry gifts to physicians and drug costs, prescription volume, or preference for generic drugs. Even less research addresses the effect of gifts on the prescribing behavior of nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and podiatrists.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Average number of Medicare Part D claims per prescriber, number of claims per patient, cost per claim, and proportion of branded claims.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between gifts provided by pharmaceutical companies to individual prescribers in Washington DC and the number of prescriptions, cost of prescriptions, and proportion of branded prescriptions for each prescriber.

PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, podiatrists, and other licensed Medicare Part D prescribers who participated in Medicare Part D (a Federal prescription drug program that covers patients over age 65 or who are disabled).

RESULTS: In 2013, 1,122 (39.1%) of 2,873 Medicare Part D prescribers received gifts from pharmaceutical companies totaling .9 million in 2013. Compared to non-gift recipients, gift recipients prescribed 2.3 more claims per patient, prescribed medications costing 0 more per claim, and prescribed 7.8% more branded drugs. In six specialties (General Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Urology, Ophthalmology, and Dermatology), gifts were associated with a significantly increased average cost of claims. For Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, and Ophthalmology, gifts were associated with more branded claims. Gift acceptance was associated with increased average cost per claim for PAs and NPs. Gift acceptance was also associated with higher proportion of branded claims for PAs but not NPs. Physicians who received small gifts (less than 00 annually) had more expensive claims ( 14 vs. 5) and more branded claims (30.3% vs. 25.7%) than physicians who received no gifts. Those receiving large gifts (greater than 00 annually) had the highest average costs per claim ( 89) and branded claims (39.9%) than other groups. All differences were statistically significant (p<0.05).

SETTING: Washington DC, 2013.

English

Powered by Koha