The effect of complete percutaneous revascularisation with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance in the drugeluting stent era.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Eurointervention. 11(6):625-33, 2015 Oct.PMID: 26499219Institution: MedStar Heart & Vascular InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Comparative Study | Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Coronary Stenosis/th [Therapy] | *Coronary Stenosis/us [Ultrasonography] | *Drug-Eluting Stents | *Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/is [Instrumentation] | *Ultrasonography, Interventional | Aged | Coronary Stenosis/mo [Mortality] | Databases, Factual | Female | Humans | Kaplan-Meier Estimate | Male | Middle Aged | Myocardial Infarction/et [Etiology] | Patient Selection | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/ae [Adverse Effects] | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mo [Mortality] | Proportional Hazards Models | Prosthesis Design | Retrospective Studies | Risk Factors | Severity of Illness Index | Time Factors | Treatment OutcomeYear: 2015ISSN:
  • 1774-024X
Name of journal: EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of CardiologyAbstract: AIMS: Our aim was to compare the outcomes of complete revascularisation (CR) and incomplete revascularisation (IR) in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), with and without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.CONCLUSIONS: CR in selected patients gives better outcomes than IR in multivessel CAD at one year. IVUS guidance can further improve results by reducing rates of repeat intervention irrespective of completeness of revascularisation.METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 2,132 consecutive patients with multivessel CAD, defined as at least two epicardial vessels with >70% stenosis, had at least one DES implant. Chronic total occlusions were not analysed. Successful treatment of epicardial vessels and significant branches was termed CR; otherwise, treatment was defined as IR. CR and IR were further categorised according to the use of IVUS. The primary outcome was death or Q-wave myocardial infarction (QWMI). Secondary outcomes included the rates of non-QWMI and repeat revascularisation, the latter assessed as either target vessel revascularisation (TVR) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at one year. CR was associated with lower rates of death/QWMI (HR 0.66 [0.4-0.9]; p=0.048) and non-QWMI at one year (1.1% vs. 2.6%; p=0.017). Completeness of revascularisation was not independently associated with repeat intervention, but rates of both TVR (89% vs. 93%; p<0.001) and TLR (91% vs. 95%; p<0.001) were higher with CR than IR. IVUS decreased the rates of TLR irrespective of completeness of revascularisation (p-interaction=0.75).All authors: Baker NC, Chen F, Escarcega RO, Lipinski MJ, Magalhaes MA, Minha S, Omar AF, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Suddath WO, Torguson R, Waksman RFiscal year: FY2016Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2016-09-07
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 26499219 Available 26499219

AIMS: Our aim was to compare the outcomes of complete revascularisation (CR) and incomplete revascularisation (IR) in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), with and without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.

CONCLUSIONS: CR in selected patients gives better outcomes than IR in multivessel CAD at one year. IVUS guidance can further improve results by reducing rates of repeat intervention irrespective of completeness of revascularisation.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 2,132 consecutive patients with multivessel CAD, defined as at least two epicardial vessels with >70% stenosis, had at least one DES implant. Chronic total occlusions were not analysed. Successful treatment of epicardial vessels and significant branches was termed CR; otherwise, treatment was defined as IR. CR and IR were further categorised according to the use of IVUS. The primary outcome was death or Q-wave myocardial infarction (QWMI). Secondary outcomes included the rates of non-QWMI and repeat revascularisation, the latter assessed as either target vessel revascularisation (TVR) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at one year. CR was associated with lower rates of death/QWMI (HR 0.66 [0.4-0.9]; p=0.048) and non-QWMI at one year (1.1% vs. 2.6%; p=0.017). Completeness of revascularisation was not independently associated with repeat intervention, but rates of both TVR (89% vs. 93%; p<0.001) and TLR (91% vs. 95%; p<0.001) were higher with CR than IR. IVUS decreased the rates of TLR irrespective of completeness of revascularisation (p-interaction=0.75).

English

Powered by Koha