Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic or Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Immunosuppression and Its Implications.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. 243:329-353, 2017PMID: 28382469Institution: MedStar Health Research Institute | MedStar Heart & Vascular InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Heart Failure/th [Therapy] | *Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/mt [Methods] | Cardiomyopathies/co [Complications] | Graft Rejection/pc [Prevention & Control] | Heart Failure/et [Etiology] | Humans | Immunosuppressive Agents/tu [Therapeutic Use] | Myocardial Ischemia/co [Complications] | Transplantation, Autologous | Transplantation, HomologousYear: 2017ISSN:
  • 0171-2004
Name of journal: Handbook of experimental pharmacologyAbstract: HF patients with signs and symptoms of worsening heart failure (HF), despite optimal medical therapy, have a poor prognosis. The pathways contributing to HF are multiple, probably accounting, in part, for current treatment approaches not being more effective. Stem cells, particularly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have a broad range of activities, making them particularly interesting candidates for a new HF therapeutic. This review presents an overview of the studies examining the efficacy of stem cell studies administered to HF patients, focusing mainly on MSCs. It examines the issues surrounding autologous vs. allogenic stem cells, the results of different routes of administration, and implications deriving from the belief that for stem cells to be effective, they must engraft in the myocardium and exert local effects. Since intravenous administration of stem cells leads to sparse cardiac engraftment, stem cell delivery strategies have uniformly involved catheter-based delivery systems. This becomes problematic in a disease that will almost certainly require delivery of the therapeutic throughout the course of the disease. Importantly, it appears that a critical contributing cause of the progressive cardiac dysfunction experienced by HF patients is the existence of a persistent inflammatory response. Since MSCs exert potent anti-inflammatory effects through paracrine mechanisms, it is possible that intravenous delivery of MSCs may be therapeutically effective. If this concept is valid, it could lead to a transformational change in stem cell delivery strategies.All authors: Epstein SE, Lipinski MJ, Luger DFiscal year: FY2017Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2017-05-06
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 28382469 Available 28382469

HF patients with signs and symptoms of worsening heart failure (HF), despite optimal medical therapy, have a poor prognosis. The pathways contributing to HF are multiple, probably accounting, in part, for current treatment approaches not being more effective. Stem cells, particularly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have a broad range of activities, making them particularly interesting candidates for a new HF therapeutic. This review presents an overview of the studies examining the efficacy of stem cell studies administered to HF patients, focusing mainly on MSCs. It examines the issues surrounding autologous vs. allogenic stem cells, the results of different routes of administration, and implications deriving from the belief that for stem cells to be effective, they must engraft in the myocardium and exert local effects. Since intravenous administration of stem cells leads to sparse cardiac engraftment, stem cell delivery strategies have uniformly involved catheter-based delivery systems. This becomes problematic in a disease that will almost certainly require delivery of the therapeutic throughout the course of the disease. Importantly, it appears that a critical contributing cause of the progressive cardiac dysfunction experienced by HF patients is the existence of a persistent inflammatory response. Since MSCs exert potent anti-inflammatory effects through paracrine mechanisms, it is possible that intravenous delivery of MSCs may be therapeutically effective. If this concept is valid, it could lead to a transformational change in stem cell delivery strategies.

English

Powered by Koha