Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Acetabular Labral Tear of the Hip: A Pilot Study.
Citation: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 98(11):1010-1017, 2019 11.PMID: 31162277Institution: MedStar National Rehabilitation NetworkForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Acetabulum/in [Injuries] | *Hip Injuries/th [Therapy] | *Plasmapheresis/mt [Methods] | *Platelet-Rich Plasma | *Ultrasonography, Interventional/mt [Methods] | Adult | Disability Evaluation | Female | Hip Joint | Humans | Injections, Intra-Articular | Male | Middle Aged | Pain Measurement | Pilot Projects | Prospective Studies | Treatment OutcomeYear: 2019ISSN:- 0894-9115
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | MedStar Authors Catalog | Article | 31162277 | Available | 31162277 |
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided injection of PRP holds promise as an emerging, minimally-invasive technique toward symptom relief, reducing pain, and improving function in patients with hip labral tears.
DESIGN: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was gained for a prospective study of eight patients (N=8), who have previously failed conservative management, to receive ultrasound-guided injection of PRP at the site of hip labrum tear. We assessed pain reduction and functional ability at baseline, and then 2, 6, and 8 weeks after injection, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS), respectively.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess whether ultrasound guided injection of platelet rich plasma (PRP) can safely and effectively treat symptoms associated with acetabular hip labral tears.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in HHS were seen two (86.5 +/- 10.8, p<0.01), six (88.0 +/- 10.7) p<0.01), and eight weeks (92.1 +/- 11.6, p<0.01) after injection as compared to baseline (76.0 +/- 13.4). Corresponding improvements were seen in VAS two (1.0, p<0.01 at rest, 2.5, p<0.01 with activity), six (0.9, p<0.01 at rest, 2.3, p<0.01 with activity), and eight weeks (0.5, p<0.01 at rest, 1.3, p<0.01 with activity) compared to baseline (3.8 at rest, 5.4 with activity).
English