Evaluation of retraction time as a predictor of postoperative motor dysfunction after minimally invasive transpsoas interbody fusion at L4-L5.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 61:124-129, 2019 Mar.PMID: 30552048Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: NeurosurgeryForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Femoral Nerve/in [Injuries] | *Muscle Weakness/et [Etiology] | *Postoperative Complications/et [Etiology] | *Spinal Fusion/ae [Adverse Effects] | Adult | Aged | Female | Humans | Lumbar Vertebrae/su [Surgery] | Male | Middle Aged | Muscle Weakness/ep [Epidemiology] | Postoperative Complications/ep [Epidemiology] | Retrospective Studies | Spinal Fusion/mt [Methods]Year: 2019ISSN:
  • 0967-5868
Name of journal: Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of AustralasiaAbstract: BACKGROUND: Complications associated with the lateral lumbar transpsoas approach largely comprise various nerve-related syndromes particularly at L4-5. Quadriceps weakness can occur from stretch injury to the femoral nerve during retraction.CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that longer retraction time (within a range of 14-51min) did not correlate with a greater risk of postoperative neuropathic quadriceps muscle dysfunction for lateral lumbar interbody fusions performed at L4-5. Other factors may contribute to postoperative neurologic dysfunction regardless of RT. Motor deficits resolved quickly after surgery.Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database at a single institution was reviewed over a two-year period (March 2014-2016) for a single surgeon. Twenty-six patients undergoing single level LLIF at L4-5 were identified. Pre- and postoperative data collection obtained included motor function grading (0-5/5) with a minimum of 3-month postoperative follow-up. Intraoperative data collection included retraction time (RT) defined as the time the retraction system was affixed to the spine and expanded to the time of closure and removal. Two-Tailed T-Test was used to determine clinical significance.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of retraction time in the development of postoperative neuropathic motor weakness at the L4-5 level.RESULTS: 50% of patients had leg weakness after surgery (13/26). All postoperative motor deficits were at least antigravity strength (>3/5) and all deficits resolved. The mean RT for the motor dysfunction cohort was 29min (14-51) compared to 27.5min for the cohort without postoperative weakness (19-37) (p=0.685).All authors: Kane S, McGowan J, Mueller K, Voyadzis JMFiscal year: FY2019Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2019-01-08
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 30552048 Available 30552048

BACKGROUND: Complications associated with the lateral lumbar transpsoas approach largely comprise various nerve-related syndromes particularly at L4-5. Quadriceps weakness can occur from stretch injury to the femoral nerve during retraction.

CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that longer retraction time (within a range of 14-51min) did not correlate with a greater risk of postoperative neuropathic quadriceps muscle dysfunction for lateral lumbar interbody fusions performed at L4-5. Other factors may contribute to postoperative neurologic dysfunction regardless of RT. Motor deficits resolved quickly after surgery.

Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database at a single institution was reviewed over a two-year period (March 2014-2016) for a single surgeon. Twenty-six patients undergoing single level LLIF at L4-5 were identified. Pre- and postoperative data collection obtained included motor function grading (0-5/5) with a minimum of 3-month postoperative follow-up. Intraoperative data collection included retraction time (RT) defined as the time the retraction system was affixed to the spine and expanded to the time of closure and removal. Two-Tailed T-Test was used to determine clinical significance.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of retraction time in the development of postoperative neuropathic motor weakness at the L4-5 level.

RESULTS: 50% of patients had leg weakness after surgery (13/26). All postoperative motor deficits were at least antigravity strength (>3/5) and all deficits resolved. The mean RT for the motor dysfunction cohort was 29min (14-51) compared to 27.5min for the cohort without postoperative weakness (19-37) (p=0.685).

English

Powered by Koha