000 | 03178nam a22005537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 130912s20132013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng dOvid Technologies | ||
022 | _a0301-2115 | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a23265300 | ||
245 | _aIncidence of corneal abrasions during pelvic reconstructive surgery. | ||
251 | _aEuropean Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Biology. 166(2):226-8, 2013 Feb. | ||
252 | _aEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 166(2):226-8, 2013 Feb. | ||
253 | _aEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology | ||
260 | _c2013 | ||
260 | _fFY2013 | ||
266 | _d2013-09-17 | ||
520 | _aCONCLUSION: More corneal abrasions occurred with laparoscopic and robotic sacral colpopexy compared to vaginal apical suspension procedures. Risk factors could not be identified in this study. Copyright 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | _aOBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of corneal abrasions after robotic/laparoscopic sacral colpopexies versus vaginal apical suspensions, and to determine risk factors associated with the development of corneal abrasions. | ||
520 | _aRESULTS: 5/216 (2.3%) patients developed corneal abrasions in the sacral colpopexy group compared to 1/332 (0.3%) in the vaginal group (p=0.04). Eye protection was more frequently documented in the sacral colpopexy group compared to the vaginal group (98.6% vs. 83.4%, p<0.001). Women in the sacral colpopexy group were younger, with longer operating times, more intravenous fluids, and lower estimated blood loss. Risk factors for corneal abrasion could not be identified due to the low number of patients with corneal abrasions. | ||
520 | _aSTUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included all women undergoing robotic/laparoscopic sacral colpopexy or vaginal apical suspensions over a 5-year period. The incidence of corneal abrasions was compared between groups and statistical analysis was performed. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _a*Cornea/in [Injuries] | ||
650 | _a*Eye Injuries/et [Etiology] | ||
650 | _a*Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ae [Adverse Effects] | ||
650 | _a*Laparoscopy/ae [Adverse Effects] | ||
650 | _a*Pelvic Organ Prolapse/su [Surgery] | ||
650 | _aAged | ||
650 | _aDistrict of Columbia/ep [Epidemiology] | ||
650 | _aEye Injuries/ep [Epidemiology] | ||
650 | _aFemale | ||
650 | _aHumans | ||
650 | _aIncidence | ||
650 | _aMiddle Aged | ||
650 | _aReconstructive Surgical Procedures/ae [Adverse Effects] | ||
650 | _aRetrospective Studies | ||
650 | _aRobotics | ||
651 | _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aObstetrics and Gynecology/Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery | ||
657 | _aComparative Study | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 | _aAntosh, Danielle D | ||
700 | _aEzzell, Ann | ||
700 | _aPark, Amy J | ||
700 | _aSokol, Andrew I | ||
700 | _aWhyte, Tori | ||
790 | _aAntosh DD, Chen BA, Ezzell A, Park AJ, Sokol AI, Whyte T | ||
856 |
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.003 _zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.003 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c1007 _d1007 |