000 | 03114nam a22003737a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 220926s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1545-9683 | ||
024 | _a10.1177/15459683221088861 [doi] | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a35925037 | ||
245 | _aBarriers to Enrollment in Post-Stroke Brain Stimulation in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population. | ||
251 | _aNeurorehabilitation & Neural Repair. :15459683221088861, 2022 Aug 04 | ||
252 | _aNeurorehabil Neural Repair. :15459683221088861, 2022 Aug 04 | ||
253 | _aNeurorehabilitation and neural repair | ||
260 | _c2022 | ||
260 | _fFY2023 | ||
260 | _p2022 Aug 04 | ||
265 | _saheadofprint | ||
266 | _d2022-09-26 | ||
501 | _aAvailable online from MWHC library: 2006 - 2009, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - March 2006 | ||
520 | _aBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain stimulation is an adjuvant strategy to promote rehabilitation after stroke. Here, we evaluated the influence of inclusion/exclusion criteria on enrollment in a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) trial in the context of a racially/ethnically diverse acute stroke service at University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW). | ||
520 | _aCONCLUSIONS: 3 main conclusions emerged: (a) The main limitations for inclusion in brain stimulation trials of motor recovery were magnitude of UE motor impairments and stroke lesion characteristics, (b) most stroke patients could be stimulated with tDCS without safety concerns and (c) carefully tailored inclusion criteria could increase diversity in enrollment.Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01007136. | ||
520 | _aMETHODS: 3124 (59.7 +/- 14.5 years) racially/ethnically diverse (38.4% non-Hispanic white, (W), Hispanic (H) 22%, African American (AA) 33.5%, Asian (A) 2.3%) patients were screened in the acute stroke service at UTSW. Demographics, stroke characteristics, and reasons for exclusion were recorded prospectively. | ||
520 | _aRESULTS: 2327 (74.5%) patients had a verified stroke. Only 44 of them (1.9%) were eligible. Causes for exclusion included in order of importance: (1) magnitude of upper extremity (UE) motor impairment, (2) prior strokes (s), (3) hemorrhagic stroke, (4) psychiatric condition or inability to follow instructions, and (5) old age, of these (2) and (4) were more common in AA patients but not in other minorities. 31 of the 44 eligible individuals were enrolled (W 1.68%, H 1.37%, AA .77%, A 3.774%). 90.5% of verified stroke patients did not exhibit contraindications for stimulation. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _aIN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED | ||
651 | _aMedStar National Rehabilitation Network | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 | _aDromerick, Alexander W | ||
790 | _aCohen LG, Dromerick AW, Hodics T, Kowalske K, Pezzullo JC | ||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683221088861 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683221088861 |
||
858 |
_yHodics, Timea _uhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8957-7807 _zhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8957-7807 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c10910 _d10910 |