000 03350nam a22003977a 4500
008 230316s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a2169-7574
024 _a10.1097/GOX.0000000000004608 [doi]
024 _aPMC9722565 [pmc]
040 _aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099 _a36479133
245 _aA Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Plastic Surgery: Looking to the Future.
251 _aPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 10(12):e4608, 2022 Dec.
252 _aPlast. reconstr. surg., Glob. open. 10(12):e4608, 2022 Dec.
253 _aPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
260 _c2022
260 _fFY2023
260 _p2022 Dec
265 _sepublish
265 _tPubMed-not-MEDLINE
520 _aArtificial intelligence (AI) is presently employed in several medical specialties, particularly those that rely on large quantities of standardized data. The integration of AI in surgical subspecialties is under preclinical investigation but is yet to be widely implemented. Plastic surgeons collect standardized data in various settings and could benefit from AI. This systematic review investigates the current clinical applications of AI in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
520 _aConclusions: The potential of AI to optimize clinical efficiency is being investigated in every subfield of plastic surgery, but much of the research to date remains in the preclinical status. Future implementation of AI into everyday clinical practice will require collaborative efforts. Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
520 _aMethods: A comprehensive literature search of the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases was conducted for AI studies with multiple search terms. Articles that progressed beyond the title and abstract screening were then subcategorized based on the plastic surgery subspecialty and AI application.
520 _aResults: The systematic search yielded a total of 1820 articles. Forty-four studies met inclusion criteria warranting further analysis. Subcategorization of articles by plastic surgery subspecialties revealed that most studies fell into aesthetic and breast surgery (27%), craniofacial surgery (23%), or microsurgery (14%). Analysis of the research study phase of included articles indicated that the current research is primarily in phase 0 (discovery and invention; 43.2%), phase 1 (technical performance and safety; 27.3%), or phase 2 (efficacy, quality improvement, and algorithm performance in a medical setting; 27.3%). Only one study demonstrated translation to clinical practice.
546 _aEnglish
651 _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center
656 _aMedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center
656 _aPlastic Surgery Residency
656 _aSurgery/Plastic Surgery
657 _aJournal Article
700 _aAbadeer, Andrew
_bMGUH
_cPlastic Surgery Residency
_dMD
_eResident PGY 5
700 _aFan, Kenneth L
_bMWHC
790 _aSpoer DL
_aKiene JM
_aDekker PK
_aHuffman SS
_aKim KG
_aAbadeer AI
_aFan KL
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004608
_zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004608
942 _cART
_dJournal Article
999 _c11479
_d11479