000 | 03350nam a22003977a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 230316s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a2169-7574 | ||
024 | _a10.1097/GOX.0000000000004608 [doi] | ||
024 | _aPMC9722565 [pmc] | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a36479133 | ||
245 | _aA Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Plastic Surgery: Looking to the Future. | ||
251 | _aPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 10(12):e4608, 2022 Dec. | ||
252 | _aPlast. reconstr. surg., Glob. open. 10(12):e4608, 2022 Dec. | ||
253 | _aPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | ||
260 | _c2022 | ||
260 | _fFY2023 | ||
260 | _p2022 Dec | ||
265 | _sepublish | ||
265 | _tPubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | _aArtificial intelligence (AI) is presently employed in several medical specialties, particularly those that rely on large quantities of standardized data. The integration of AI in surgical subspecialties is under preclinical investigation but is yet to be widely implemented. Plastic surgeons collect standardized data in various settings and could benefit from AI. This systematic review investigates the current clinical applications of AI in plastic and reconstructive surgery. | ||
520 | _aConclusions: The potential of AI to optimize clinical efficiency is being investigated in every subfield of plastic surgery, but much of the research to date remains in the preclinical status. Future implementation of AI into everyday clinical practice will require collaborative efforts. Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. | ||
520 | _aMethods: A comprehensive literature search of the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases was conducted for AI studies with multiple search terms. Articles that progressed beyond the title and abstract screening were then subcategorized based on the plastic surgery subspecialty and AI application. | ||
520 | _aResults: The systematic search yielded a total of 1820 articles. Forty-four studies met inclusion criteria warranting further analysis. Subcategorization of articles by plastic surgery subspecialties revealed that most studies fell into aesthetic and breast surgery (27%), craniofacial surgery (23%), or microsurgery (14%). Analysis of the research study phase of included articles indicated that the current research is primarily in phase 0 (discovery and invention; 43.2%), phase 1 (technical performance and safety; 27.3%), or phase 2 (efficacy, quality improvement, and algorithm performance in a medical setting; 27.3%). Only one study demonstrated translation to clinical practice. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
651 | _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aMedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aPlastic Surgery Residency | ||
656 | _aSurgery/Plastic Surgery | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 |
_aAbadeer, Andrew _bMGUH _cPlastic Surgery Residency _dMD _eResident PGY 5 |
||
700 |
_aFan, Kenneth L _bMWHC |
||
790 |
_aSpoer DL _aKiene JM _aDekker PK _aHuffman SS _aKim KG _aAbadeer AI _aFan KL |
||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004608 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004608 |
||
942 |
_cART _dJournal Article |
||
999 |
_c11479 _d11479 |