000 | 03846nam a22005537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 240807s20242024 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a0148-7043 | ||
024 | _a00000637-202407000-00016 [pii] | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a38885167 | ||
245 | _aPropeller Flap Reconstruction Following Pilonidal Cyst Excision: A Single-Center Experience With Same-Day Discharge. | ||
251 | _aAnnals of Plastic Surgery. 93(1):89-93, 2024 Jul 01. | ||
252 | _aAnn Plast Surg. 93(1):89-93, 2024 Jul 01. | ||
253 | _aAnnals of plastic surgery | ||
260 | _c2024 | ||
260 | _fFY2024 | ||
260 | _p2024 Jul 01 | ||
265 | _sppublish | ||
265 | _tMEDLINE | ||
266 | _d2024-08-07 | ||
266 | _z2024/06/17 13:13 | ||
501 | _aAvailable online from MWHC library: 2001 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006 | ||
520 | _aCONCLUSIONS: Propeller flaps provide a successful and reliable reconstructive option for pilonidal disease defects. Because patients in our cohort experienced favorable outcomes and functional improvement, we advocate for same-day discharge in order to reduce hospital and patient burden. Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | _aINTRODUCTION: Reconstruction following pilonidal cyst resection must balance risk of recurrence, healing time, and resumption of functional routine. Propeller flaps provide a reliable and effective reconstructive option. This study highlights our experience with propeller flap reconstruction following pilonidal cyst resection and demonstrates the efficacy of same-day discharge. | ||
520 | _aMETHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed for propeller flap reconstructions completed from March 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics, pilonidal cyst details, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Primary outcomes included flap survival, flap complications, and pilonidal disease recurrence. | ||
520 | _aRESULTS: Twenty-eight outpatient propeller flap reconstructions following pilonidal cyst resections were identified in 26 patients, with two patients receiving a second propeller flap due to recurrence. Most patients were male (n = 15, 57.7%) with a mean age at time of index operation of 25.5 +/- 5.8 years and mean body mass index of 26.5 +/- 4.1 kg/m2. Mean symptom duration prior to index surgery was 39.3 months. Mean skin defect size following resection was 28.3 +/- 15.3 cm2, with a mean flap size of 44.7 +/- 35.5 cm2. Flap survival was 100% (n = 28), with five flaps (17.9%) experiencing minor wound complications and one patient (3.8%) requiring return to the operating room. Mean time to functional improvement was 24.0 +/- 22.8 days. Pilonidal disease recurrence occurred in three patients (11.5%). Mean follow-up was 4.1 +/- 5.4 months. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _a*Pilonidal Sinus | ||
650 | _a*Plastic Surgery Procedures | ||
650 | _aAdult | ||
650 | _aAmbulatory Surgical Procedures/mt [Methods] | ||
650 | _aFemale | ||
650 | _aHumans | ||
650 | _aMale | ||
650 | _aPatient Discharge | ||
650 | _aPilonidal Sinus/su [Surgery] | ||
650 | _aPlastic Surgery Procedures/mt [Methods] | ||
650 | _aRetrospective Studies | ||
650 | _aSurgical Flaps | ||
650 | _aYoung Adult | ||
650 | _zAutomated | ||
656 | _aMedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aPlastic Surgery Residency | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 |
_aAbdou, Salma _bMGUH _cPlastic Surgery Residency _dMD |
||
790 | _aTowfighi P, Huffman SS, Sayyed AA, Suvarnakar AM, Abdou S, Fitzgibbons SC, Drew EL, Youn RC, Kleiber GM | ||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003973 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003973 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c14584 _d14584 |