000 04079nam a22005297a 4500
008 180818s20182018 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a0039-6060
024 _a10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.007 [doi]
024 _aS0039-6060(18)30218-6 [pii]
040 _aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099 _a30087042
245 _aThe Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion and utilization of discretionary vs. non-discretionary inpatient surgery.
251 _aSurgery. 164(6):1156-1161, 2018 12.
252 _aSurgery. 164(6):1156-1161, 2018 12.
253 _aSurgery
260 _c2018
260 _fFY2019
266 _d2018-08-16
501 _aAvailable online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006
520 _aBACKGROUND: While pre-Affordable Care Act expansions in Medicaid eligibility led to increased utilization of elective inpatient procedures, the impact of the Affordable Care Act on such preference-sensitive procedures (also known as discretionary procedures) versus time-sensitive non-discretionary procedures remains unknown. As such, we performed a hospital-level quasi-experimental evaluation to measure the differential effects of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on utilization of discretionary procedures versus non-discretionary procedures.
520 _aCONCLUSION: In this multi-state evaluation, the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion preferentially increased utilization of discretionary procedures versus non-discretionary procedures in expansion states compared to non-expansion states among non-privately insured patients. These preliminary findings suggest that increased Medicaid coverage may have contributed to the increased use of inpatient surgery for discretionary procedures.
520 _aCopyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
520 _aMETHODS: The State Inpatient Database (2012-2014) yielded 476 hospitals providing selected discretionary procedures or non-discretionary procedures performed on 288,446 non-elderly, adult patients across 3 expansion states and 2 non-expansion control states. Discretionary procedures included non-emergent total knee and hip arthroplasty, while non-discretionary procedures included nine cancer surgeries. Mixed Poisson interrupted time series analyses were performed to determine the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on the number of discretionary procedures versus non-discretionary procedures provided among non-privately insured patients (Medicaid and uninsured patients) and privately insured patients.
520 _aRESULTS: Analysis of the number of non-privately insured procedures showed an increase in discretionary procedures of +15.1% (IRR 1.15, 95% CI:1.11-1.19) vs -4.0% (IRR 0.96, 95% CI:0.94-0.99) and non-discretionary procedures of +4.1% (IRR 1.04, 95% CI:1.0-1.1) vs -5.3% (IRR 0.95, 95% CI:0.93-0.97) in expansion states compared to non-expansion states, respectively. Analysis of privately insured procedures showed no statistically meaningful change in discretionary procedures or non-discretionary procedures in either expansion or non-expansion states.
546 _aEnglish
650 _a*Elective Surgical Procedures/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data]
650 _a*Medicaid
650 _a*Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
650 _aAdolescent
650 _aAdult
650 _aElective Surgical Procedures/ec [Economics]
650 _aFemale
650 _aHumans
650 _aMale
650 _aMiddle Aged
650 _aUnited States
650 _aYoung Adult
651 _aMedStar Health Research Institute
651 _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center
657 _aJournal Article
700 _aAl-Refaie, Waddah B
700 _aShara, Nawar M
700 _aZeymo, Alexander
790 _aAl-Refaie WB, Chan K, Crocker AB, DeLeire T, Johnson LB, Shara N, Xiao D, Zeymo A
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.007
_zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.007
942 _cART
_dArticle
999 _c3660
_d3660