000 04991nam a22007937a 4500
008 180928s20192019 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1876-7591
024 _a10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.014 [doi]
024 _aS1936-878X(18)30667-3 [pii]
040 _aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099 _a30219407
245 _aPulmonary Venous Waveforms Predict Rehospitalization and Mortality After Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.
251 _aJacc: Cardiovascular Imaging. 12(10):1905-1913, 2019 10.
252 _aJACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 12(10):1905-1913, 2019 10.
252 _zJACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Sep 06
253 _aJACC. Cardiovascular imaging
260 _c2019
260 _fFY2020
265 _saheadofprint
265 _sppublish
266 _d2018-09-28
268 _aJacc: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018 Sep 06
269 _fFY2019
520 _aBACKGROUND: The effects of hemodynamic changes during percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) with MitraClip (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) are incompletely characterized.
520 _aCONCLUSIONS: PV waveforms are important markers of procedural success after PMVR. Our data show intraprocedural PV waveforms may predict rehospitalization and mortality after PMVR. A larger, multicenter cohort will be important to clarify this relationship.
520 _aCopyright (c) 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
520 _aMETHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed records and intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiograms of 115 consecutive patients (age 76 +/- 12 years) who underwent PMVR for mitral regurgitation (MR) from May 2013 to January 2017 at Emory University Hospital. They assessed intraprocedural PV waveforms for improvement in morphology, measured change in MR grade by semiquantitative methods, evaluated invasive changes in left atrial pressure (LAP) and V-wave, and compared with 30-day and 1-year rehospitalization and all-cause mortality.
520 _aOBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors hypothesized that intraprocedural improvement of pulmonary venous (PV) waveforms are predictive of improved outcomes. In this report, they analyzed intraprocedural invasive and echocardiographic changes with respect to rehospitalization and mortality.
520 _aRESULTS: Ninety-three cases (80%) had PV waveforms before and after clip placement sufficient for analysis, of which 67 (73%) demonstrated intraprocedural improvement in PV morphology and 25 (27%) did not. At 24 months, 57 (85%) of those with PV improvement were living, compared with only 10 (40%) of those without improvement. Proportional hazards models demonstrated a significant survival advantage in those with PV improvement (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.93, p = 0.038). By multivariable analysis, PV improvement predicted reduced 1-year cardiac rehospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 0.18, p = 0.044). Intraprocedural assessment of MR grade and invasive hemodynamics did not consistently predict mortality and rehospitalization.
546 _aEnglish
650 _a*Cardiac Catheterization/mo [Mortality]
650 _a*Echocardiography, Doppler
650 _a*Echocardiography, Transesophageal
650 _a*Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mo [Mortality]
650 _a*Mitral Valve Insufficiency/su [Surgery]
650 _a*Mitral Valve/su [Surgery]
650 _a*Patient Readmission
650 _a*Pulmonary Veins/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
650 _aAged
650 _aAged, 80 and over
650 _aAtrial Function, Left
650 _aAtrial Pressure
650 _aCardiac Catheterization/ae [Adverse Effects]
650 _aCause of Death
650 _aFemale
650 _aHeart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/ae [Adverse Effects]
650 _aHumans
650 _aMale
650 _aMiddle Aged
650 _aMitral Valve Insufficiency/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
650 _aMitral Valve Insufficiency/mo [Mortality]
650 _aMitral Valve Insufficiency/pp [Physiopathology]
650 _aMitral Valve/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
650 _aMitral Valve/pp [Physiopathology]
650 _aPredictive Value of Tests
650 _aPulmonary Circulation
650 _aPulmonary Veins/pp [Physiopathology]
650 _aRetrospective Studies
650 _aRisk Assessment
650 _aRisk Factors
650 _aTime Factors
650 _aTreatment Outcome
651 _aMedStar Heart & Vascular Institute
657 _aJournal Article
700 _aThourani, Vinod H
790 _aAlvarez L, Babaliaros VC, Binongo JN, Block PC, Chen JH, Clements SD, Condado JF, Corrigan FE 3rd, Gleason PT, Howell S, Kamioka N, Keegan P, Lerakis S, Lisko JC, Maini A, Reginauld S, Thourani VH, Wei JW
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.014
_zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.014
942 _cART
_dArticle
999 _c3721
_d3721