000 | 03421nam a22004337a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 220926s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a0363-5023 | ||
024 | _a10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.05.003 [doi] | ||
024 | _aS0363-5023(22)00262-3 [pii] | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a35778231 | ||
245 | _aAll-Suture Anchor Repair of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Insertion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Suturing Techniques. | ||
251 | _aJournal of Hand Surgery - American Volume. 2022 Jun 28 | ||
252 | _aJ Hand Surg [Am]. 2022 Jun 28 | ||
253 | _aThe Journal of hand surgery | ||
260 | _c2022 | ||
260 | _fFY2022 | ||
260 | _p2022 Jun 28 | ||
265 | _saheadofprint | ||
266 | _d2022-09-26 | ||
501 | _aAvailable in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2002, Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present | ||
520 | _aCLINICAL RELEVANCE: The H + K technique combines the benefits of horizontal-mattress tendon-to-bone apposition and Krackow-tendon locking. It converts the point of failure to the bone level rather than the suture-tendon level. Copyright © 2022 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | _aCONCLUSIONS: The H + K group performed significantly better regarding cyclic and load-to-failure testing after FDP reattachment. | ||
520 | _aMETHODS: We used fresh, matched-pair, cadaveric hands. We disarticulated the fingers at the proximal interphalangeal joints, preserving the proximal FDP. We released the FDPs at their distal insertion and placed an all-suture, 1.0-mm anchor at the center of each FDP footprint. Each anchor's sutures were used to reattach each FDP using 1 of 2 techniques: group H (n = 14) via horizontal mattress; group H + K (n = 12) via horizontal mattress with knots thrown and, with each suture tail, 3 proximal, running-locking, Krackow-type passes on the radial and ulnar FDP sides with the suture ends tied together. We excluded 2 specimens from the H + K group because of improper anchor placement. All other fingers in both groups were individually mounted in an MTS machine for FDP loading in the following sequence for 500 cycles each: (1) to 15 N to simulate passive motion forces; (2) to 19 N for short-arc active motion forces; and (3) to 28 N for full active motion forces. Specimens that had not failed during cyclic testing were then loaded to failure. We measured FDP-to-bone gapping via a digital transducer. We defined failure as >3-mm gapping. | ||
520 | _aPURPOSE: We compared 2 suturing techniques for reattachment of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) via all-suture anchor. | ||
520 | _aRESULTS: The H + K group had significantly less gapping during cyclic loading up to 19 N and significantly higher load to failure. The H + K group failed exclusively at the anchor-bone level; the H group failed mostly by suture-tendon pullout. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _aIN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED | ||
651 | _aCurtis National Hand Center | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 | _aAbbasi, Pooyan | ||
700 | _aBelyea, Christopher M | ||
700 | _aGiladi, Aviram M | ||
700 | _aMeans, Kenneth R Jr | ||
700 | _aSanghavi, Kavya K | ||
790 | _aAbbasi P, Belyea CM, Giladi AM, Means KR Jr, Sanghavi KK | ||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.05.003 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.05.003 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c409 _d409 |