000 04644nam a22005537a 4500
008 200226s20202020 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a0735-1097
024 _a10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.049 [doi]
024 _aS0735-1097(19)38682-6 [pii]
040 _aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099 _a32029128
245 _aGlobal Longitudinal Strain and Cardiac Events in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Myocarditis.
251 _aJournal of the American College of Cardiology. 75(5):467-478, 2020 02 11.
252 _aJ Am Coll Cardiol. 75(5):467-478, 2020 02 11.
252 _zJ Am Coll Cardiol. 75(5):467-478, 2020 Feb 11.
253 _aJournal of the American College of Cardiology
260 _c2020
260 _fFY2020
265 _sppublish
266 _d2020-02-26
268 _aJournal of the American College of Cardiology. 75(5):467-478, 2020 Feb 11.
520 _aBACKGROUND: There is a need for improved methods for detection and risk stratification of myocarditis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a sensitive marker of cardiac toxicity among patients receiving standard chemotherapy. There are no data on the use of GLS in ICI myocarditis.
520 _aCONCLUSIONS: GLS decreases with ICI myocarditis and, compared with control subjects, was lower among cases presenting with either a preserved or reduced EF. Lower GLS was strongly associated with MACE in ICI myocarditis presenting with either a preserved or reduced EF. Crown Copyright (c) 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
520 _aMETHODS: This study retrospectively compared echocardiographic GLS by speckle tracking at presentation with ICI myocarditis (cases, n = 101) to that from patients receiving an ICI who did not develop myocarditis (control subjects, n = 92). Where available, GLS was also measured pre-ICI in both groups. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite of cardiogenic shock, arrest, complete heart block, and cardiac death.
520 _aOBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the role of GLS and assess its association with cardiac events among patients with ICI myocarditis.
520 _aRESULTS: Cases and control subjects were similar in age, sex, and cancer type. At presentation with myocarditis, 61 cases (60%) had a normal ejection fraction (EF). Pre-ICI, GLS was similar between cases and control subjects (20.3 +/- 2.6% vs. 20.6 +/- 2.0%; p = 0.60). There was no change in GLS among control subjects on an ICI without myocarditis (pre-ICI vs. on ICI, 20.6 +/- 2.0% vs. 20.5 +/- 1.9%; p = 0.41); in contrast, among cases, GLS decreased to 14.1 +/- 2.8% (p < 0.001). The GLS at presentation with myocarditis was lower among cases presenting with either a reduced (12.3 +/- 2.7%) or preserved EF (15.3 +/- 2.0%; p < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 162 days, 51 (51%) experienced MACE. The risk of MACE was higher with a lower GLS among patients with either a reduced or preserved EF. After adjustment for EF, each percent reduction in GLS was associated with a 1.5-fold increase in MACE among patients with a reduced EF (hazard ratio: 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 1.8) and a 4.4-fold increase with a preserved EF (hazard ratio: 4.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 7.8).
546 _aEnglish
650 _a*Antineoplastic Agents/ae [Adverse Effects]
650 _a*Echocardiography
650 _a*Myocarditis/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
650 _aAged
650 _aAged, 80 and over
650 _aFemale
650 _aHumans
650 _aLung Neoplasms/dt [Drug Therapy]
650 _aMale
650 _aMelanoma/dt [Drug Therapy]
650 _aMiddle Aged
650 _aMyocarditis/ci [Chemically Induced]
650 _aMyocarditis/co [Complications]
650 _aRetrospective Studies
651 _aMedStar Heart & Vascular Institute
657 _aJournal Article
700 _aBarac, Ana
700 _aForrestal, Brian J
790 _aAlvi RM, Awadalla M, Bakar RB, Banerji D, Barac A, Chen CL, Cohen JV, Devereux RB, Ederhy S, Forrestal BJ, Fradley MG, Ganatra S, Groarke JD, Gupta D, Hassan MZO, Heinzerling LM, Hung J, Jones-O'Connor M, Kirchberger MC, Lawrence DP, Liu S, Lyon AR, Mahmood SS, Mahmoudi M, Mandawat A, Mercaldo ND, Mulligan CP, Murphy SP, Neilan TG, Nohria A, Picard MH, Reynolds KL, Rizvi MA, Rokicki A, Sahni G, Shah SP, Sullivan RJ, Thavendiranathan P, Thuny F, Tocchetti CG, Zhang L, Zlotoff DA
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.049
_zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.049
942 _cART
_dArticle
999 _c5011
_d5011