000 | 03286nam a22005897a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 200709s20202020 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1067-5027 | ||
024 | _a10.1093/jamia/ocaa047 [doi] | ||
024 | _a5831558 [pii] | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a32377679 | ||
245 | _aVarying rates of patient identity verification when using computerized provider order entry. | ||
251 | _aJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 27(6):924-928, 2020 06 01. | ||
252 | _aJ Am Med Inform Assoc. 27(6):924-928, 2020 06 01. | ||
252 | _zJ Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 07 | ||
253 | _aJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA | ||
260 | _c2020 | ||
260 | _fFY2020 | ||
265 | _saheadofprint | ||
265 | _sppublish | ||
266 | _d2020-07-09 | ||
268 | _aJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2020 May 07 | ||
501 | _aAvailable online through MWHC library: 2003 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - present | ||
520 | _aCONCLUSIONS: Verification rates vary by CPOE product, and this can have patient safety consequences. Copyright (c) The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected]. | ||
520 | _aDISCUSSION: Factors such as CPOE design, physician training, and the use of a simulated methodology may be impacting verification rates. | ||
520 | _aMATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five physicians from 4 healthcare systems completed simulated patient scenarios using their respective CPOE system (Epic or Cerner). Eye movements were recorded and analyzed. | ||
520 | _aOBJECTIVE: We sought to determine rates of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) patient identity verification and when and where in the ordering process verification occurred. | ||
520 | _aRESULTS: Across all participants patient id was verified significantly more often than not (62.4% vs 37.6%). Vendor A had significantly higher verification rates than not; vendor B had no difference. Participants using vendor A verified information significantly more often before signing the order than after (88.4% vs 11.6%); there was no difference in vendor B. The banner bar was the most frequent verification location. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _a*Medical Order Entry Systems | ||
650 | _a*Patient Identification Systems | ||
650 | _a*Patient Safety | ||
650 | _aDelivery of Health Care | ||
650 | _aHumans | ||
650 | _aPhysicians | ||
650 | _aSoftware | ||
650 | _aTime and Motion Studies | ||
651 | _aMedStar Institute for Innovation | ||
651 | _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aEmergency Medicine | ||
656 | _aNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 | _aFong, Allan | ||
700 | _aHettinger, Aaron Z | ||
700 | _aHowe, Jessica L | ||
700 | _aMiller, Kristen | ||
700 | _aPruitt, Zoe | ||
700 | _aRatwani, Raj M | ||
790 | _aFong A, Fortman E, Hettinger AZ, Howe JL, Miller K, Pruitt Z, Ratwani RM | ||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa047 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa047 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c5063 _d5063 |