000 | 03736nam a22005177a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 201006s20202020 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a0724-4983 | ||
024 | _a10.1007/s00345-020-03446-y [doi] | ||
024 | _a10.1007/s00345-020-03446-y [pii] | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a32944804 | ||
245 | _aA multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis. | ||
251 | _aWorld Journal of Urology. 39(7):2669-2675, 2021 Jul. | ||
252 | _aWorld J Urol. 39(7):2669-2675, 2021 Jul. | ||
252 | _zWorld J Urol. 2020 Sep 17 | ||
253 | _aWorld journal of urology | ||
260 | _c2021 | ||
260 | _fFY2022 | ||
265 | _saheadofprint | ||
265 | _sppublish | ||
266 | _d2020-10-06 | ||
268 | _aWorld Journal of Urology. 2020 Sep 17 | ||
520 | _aCONCLUSION: Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique in patients with post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. This non-transecting approach may confer low rates of de-novo SUI. Further research is needed to compare this technique with excisional urethroplasty. | ||
520 | _aMETHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with posterior urethral stenosis from 10 institutions between 2010-2019 was performed. Patients with at least 1-year follow-up were assessed. Patient demographics, stenosis characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, and post-operative clinical and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and de-novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were changes in voiding, sexual function, and patient-reported satisfaction. | ||
520 | _aPURPOSE: To critically evaluate a multi-institutional patient cohort undergoing Dorsal-Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty (D-BMGU) for recurrent post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. | ||
520 | _aRESULTS: Seventy-nine men with post-radiation urethral stenosis treated with D-BMGU met inclusion criteria. Median age and stenosis length were 72 years, (IQR 66-75), and 3.0 cm (IQR 2.5-4 cm), respectively. Radiation modalities included: 36 (45.6%) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 13 (16.5%) brachytherapy (BT), 10 (12.7%) combination EBRT/BT, and 20 (25.3%) EBRT/radical prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 13-40), 14 patients (17.7%) had stenosis recurrence. Among 37 preoperatively-continent patients, 3 men (8.1%) developed de-novo SUI following dorsal onlay urethroplasty. Of 29 patients with preoperative SUI all but one remained incontinent post-operatively (96.6%). Following repair, patients experienced significant improvement in PVR (92.5 to 26 cc, p = 0.001) and Uroflow (4.6 to 15.9 cc/s, p = 0.001), and high overall satisfaction, with 91.9% reporting a GRA of + 2 or better). | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _a*Mouth Mucosa/tr [Transplantation] | ||
650 | _a*Radiation Injuries/su [Surgery] | ||
650 | _a*Urethra/su [Surgery] | ||
650 | _a*Urethral Stricture/et [Etiology] | ||
650 | _a*Urethral Stricture/su [Surgery] | ||
650 | _aAged | ||
650 | _aHumans | ||
650 | _aMale | ||
650 | _aRecurrence | ||
650 | _aRetrospective Studies | ||
650 | _aUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male/mt [Methods] | ||
651 | _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aUrology | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 | _aVenkatesan, Krishnan | ||
790 | _aAngulo JC, Blakely S, Flynn BJ, Gupta S, Hughes M, Lumen N, Martins FE, Nikolavsky D, Policastro CG, Ramirez Perez EA, Redger K, Rusilko P, Simhan J, Venkatesan K | ||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03446-y _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03446-y |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c5561 _d5561 |