000 02919nam a22003857a 4500
008 210607s20212021 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1177-5467
024 _a10.2147/OPTH.S259012 [doi]
024 _a259012 [pii]
024 _aPMC8018415 [pmc]
040 _aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099 _a33824576
245 _aOutcomes of Conductive Keratoplasty Combined with Corneal Crosslinking in Advanced Ectatic Corneal Disease.
251 _aClinical Ophthalmology. 15:1317-1329, 2021.
252 _aClin. ophthalmol.. 15:1317-1329, 2021.
253 _aClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
260 _c2021
260 _fFY2021
265 _sepublish
266 _d2021-06-07
520 _aConclusion: Conductive keratoplasty with a proprietary epi-on CXL treatment improved vision in patients with advanced ectasia This CK/epi-on CXL treatment offers the possibility of improved VA for patients with compromised vision due to ectasia. Copyright (c) 2021 Sinjab et al.
520 _aMethods: Retrospective, exploratory cohort study. Patients with keratoconus or postsurgical ectasia and best spectacle-corrected distance VA (CDVA) <= 20/40 were included. Conductive keratoplasty was performed (ViewPoint CK System, Refractec, Inc., Bloomington, MN); followed a day later by epi-on CXL (CXLUSA/CXLO, Bethesda, MD/CXLO Encinitas, CA). Measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA, as well as refractive and tomographic measures and tomographic indices.
520 _aPurpose: To assess the effectiveness of a novel treatment for patients with advanced corneal ectasia and loss of visual acuity (VA). Conductive keratoplasty (CK) is performed to improve VA followed by epithelium-on (epi-on) corneal crosslinking (CXL) to stabilize the cornea after CK.
520 _aResults: Data from 50 eyes of 45 patients were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 15.1 +/- 12.2 months (range: 2 to 51). Overall, UDVA and CDVA improved postoperatively. Subjective refraction and tomographic metrics did not show consistent changes, but changes in tomographic indices were associated with treatment follow-up time. At the 1-year visit, mean UDVA significantly improved over baseline (P = 0.009) by approximately 3 lines; mean CDVA improved significantly (P = 10-5) by approximately 2 lines. No eye lost lines of CDVA. Change in the Index of Surface Variance (ISV) was associated with treatment, and the D-Index trended over follow-up time.
546 _aEnglish
650 _aIN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED
651 _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center
656 _aOphthalmology
657 _aJournal Article
700 _aRubinfeld, Roy S
700 _aWagner, Kirsten
790 _aBelin MW, Cummings AB, Parsons Jnr EC, Rubinfeld RS, Sinjab MM, Wagner K
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S259012
_zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S259012
942 _cART
_dArticle
999 _c6396
_d6396