000 | 02919nam a22003857a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 210607s20212021 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1177-5467 | ||
024 | _a10.2147/OPTH.S259012 [doi] | ||
024 | _a259012 [pii] | ||
024 | _aPMC8018415 [pmc] | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a33824576 | ||
245 | _aOutcomes of Conductive Keratoplasty Combined with Corneal Crosslinking in Advanced Ectatic Corneal Disease. | ||
251 | _aClinical Ophthalmology. 15:1317-1329, 2021. | ||
252 | _aClin. ophthalmol.. 15:1317-1329, 2021. | ||
253 | _aClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) | ||
260 | _c2021 | ||
260 | _fFY2021 | ||
265 | _sepublish | ||
266 | _d2021-06-07 | ||
520 | _aConclusion: Conductive keratoplasty with a proprietary epi-on CXL treatment improved vision in patients with advanced ectasia This CK/epi-on CXL treatment offers the possibility of improved VA for patients with compromised vision due to ectasia. Copyright (c) 2021 Sinjab et al. | ||
520 | _aMethods: Retrospective, exploratory cohort study. Patients with keratoconus or postsurgical ectasia and best spectacle-corrected distance VA (CDVA) <= 20/40 were included. Conductive keratoplasty was performed (ViewPoint CK System, Refractec, Inc., Bloomington, MN); followed a day later by epi-on CXL (CXLUSA/CXLO, Bethesda, MD/CXLO Encinitas, CA). Measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA, as well as refractive and tomographic measures and tomographic indices. | ||
520 | _aPurpose: To assess the effectiveness of a novel treatment for patients with advanced corneal ectasia and loss of visual acuity (VA). Conductive keratoplasty (CK) is performed to improve VA followed by epithelium-on (epi-on) corneal crosslinking (CXL) to stabilize the cornea after CK. | ||
520 | _aResults: Data from 50 eyes of 45 patients were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 15.1 +/- 12.2 months (range: 2 to 51). Overall, UDVA and CDVA improved postoperatively. Subjective refraction and tomographic metrics did not show consistent changes, but changes in tomographic indices were associated with treatment follow-up time. At the 1-year visit, mean UDVA significantly improved over baseline (P = 0.009) by approximately 3 lines; mean CDVA improved significantly (P = 10-5) by approximately 2 lines. No eye lost lines of CDVA. Change in the Index of Surface Variance (ISV) was associated with treatment, and the D-Index trended over follow-up time. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _aIN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED | ||
651 | _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aOphthalmology | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 | _aRubinfeld, Roy S | ||
700 | _aWagner, Kirsten | ||
790 | _aBelin MW, Cummings AB, Parsons Jnr EC, Rubinfeld RS, Sinjab MM, Wagner K | ||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S259012 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S259012 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c6396 _d6396 |