000 03821nam a22005297a 4500
008 220222s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
024 _a10.1002/cncr.34133 [doi]
040 _aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099 _a35143041
245 _aImproved motivation and readiness to quit shortly after lung cancer screening: Evidence for a teachable moment.
251 _aCancer. 128(10):1976-1986, 2022 May 15.
252 _aCancer. 128(10):1976-1986, 2022 May 15.
252 _zCancer. 2022 Feb 10
253 _aCancer
260 _c2022
260 _fFY2022
260 _p2022 Feb 10
265 _sppublish
266 _d2022-02-22
268 _aCancer. 2022 Feb 10
501 _aAvailable online from the MWHC library: 1948 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006
520 _aBACKGROUND: For patients at high risk for lung cancer, screening using low-dose computed tomography (lung cancer screening [LCS]) is recommended. The purpose of this study was to examine whether screening may serve as a teachable moment for smoking-related outcomes.
520 _aCONCLUSIONS: During the brief window between registering for LCS and receiving the results, the authors observed that very few participants quit smoking, but a significant proportion improved on readiness and motivation to quit, particularly among individuals who were undergoing their first scan and those who were extremely worried about lung cancer. These results indicate that providing evidence-based tobacco treatment can build upon this teachable moment. Copyright (c) 2022 American Cancer Society.
520 _aMETHODS: In a smoking-cessation trial, participants (N = 843) completed 2 phone interviews before randomization: before LCS (T0) and after LCS (T1). By using logistic and linear regression, the authors examined teachable moment variables (perceived risk, lung cancer worry) and outcomes (readiness, motivation, and cigarettes per day [CPD]).
520 _aRESULTS: Participants were a mean +/- SD age of 63.7 +/- 5.9 years, had 47.8 +/- 7.1 pack-years of smoking, 35.2% had a high school diploma or General Educational Development (high school equivalency) degree or less, and 42.3% were undergoing their first scan. Between T0 and T1, 25.7% of participants increased readiness to quit, 9.6% decreased readiness, and 64.7% reported no change (P < .001). Motivation to quit increased (P < .05) and CPD decreased between assessments (P < .001), but only 1.3% self-reported quitting. Compared with individuals who reported no lung cancer worry/little worry, extreme worry was associated with readiness to quit in the next 30 days (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and with higher motivation (b = 0.83; P < .001) at T1. Individuals undergoing a baseline (vs annual) scan were more ready to quit in the next 30 days (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5).
546 _aEnglish
650 _a*Lung Neoplasms
650 _a*Smoking Cessation
650 _aAged
650 _aEarly Detection of Cancer
650 _aHumans
650 _aLung Neoplasms/di [Diagnosis]
650 _aLung Neoplasms/pc [Prevention & Control]
650 _aMiddle Aged
650 _aMotivation
650 _aSmoking Cessation/mt [Methods]
650 _aSmoking Cessation/px [Psychology]
650 _aSmoking/ae [Adverse Effects]
650 _aSmoking/ep [Epidemiology]
656 _aMedStar Shah Medical Group
656 _aPopulation Health
657 _aJournal Article
700 _aParikh, Vicky
790 _aAbrams DB, Cordon M, Eyestone E, Lung Screening, Tobacco, Health Trial, Luta G, McKee BJ, Niaura RS, Parikh V, Regis SM, Smith L, Stanton CA, Taylor KL, Williams RM
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34133
_zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34133
942 _cART
_dArticle
999 _c747
_d747