To Bot or Not? Challenging the Top Social Media Influencers in #PlasticSurgery. (Record no. 4032)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03392nam a22005057a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190118s20192019 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 0032-1052
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 00006534-201901000-00065 [pii]
024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005103 [doi]
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency Ovid MEDLINE(R)
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC)
PMID 30589813
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title To Bot or Not? Challenging the Top Social Media Influencers in #PlasticSurgery.
251 ## - Source
Source Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 143(1):337-343, 2019 Jan.
252 ## - Abbreviated Source
Abbreviated source Plast Reconstr Surg. 143(1):337-343, 2019 Jan.
253 ## - Journal Name
Journal name Plastic and reconstructive surgery
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Year 2019
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Manufacturer FY2019
265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE]
Publication status ppublish
266 ## - Date added to catalog
Date added to catalog 2019-01-18
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract BACKGROUND: The influence of social media on plastic surgery continues to be explored. Prospective patients may seek out surgeons with greater number of followers. Recently, companies selling Twitter bots have been exposed. The authors sought to examine the number of fake users, practice types, and the content of tweets broadcasted by top influencers in plastic surgery.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons are quick to adapt to the dynamic and evolving nature of social media. However, academic surgeons are poorly represented among the top influencers. Although top influencers are board-certified plastic surgeons, they continue to occupy only a fraction of the total discourse on plastic surgery.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract METHODS: Top 100 influencers were identified. The influencers were categorized into academic versus private practice and sorted according to their board-certification status. Among each board-certification status, the top five influencers of each category (American Board of Plastic Surgery, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, international plastic surgeon, other physician, nonphysician) were determined, and their 300 most recent tweets were analyzed for educational, promotional, or personal content. Fake bots among respective followers were identified by TwitterAudit.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract RESULTS: Private practice surgeons represented 68 percent of the top tweeters. Academicians were only 8 percent. American board- certified surgeons represented 55 percent of the top tweeters. Compared with American board-certified surgeons, nonphysicians had a higher number of fake bots. Among the 7500 tweets that were analyzed, nonphysicians were more likely to have promotional and less likely to have educational posts when comparing to board-certified American or international plastic surgeons.
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element *Practice Patterns, Physicians'/es [Ethics]
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element *Social Media/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data]
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element *Surgery, Plastic/es [Ethics]
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Adult
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Chi-Square Distribution
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Cohort Studies
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Female
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Humans
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Male
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Prospective Studies
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Social Perception
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element United States
651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Institution MedStar Washington Hospital Center
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department Surgery/Plastic Surgery
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION
Medline publication type Journal Article
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Economides, James M
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Fan, Kenneth L
790 ## - Authors
All authors Economides JM, Fan KL, Song DH
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
DOI <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005103">https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005103</a>
Public note https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005103
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal Article
Item type description Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          MedStar Authors Catalog MedStar Authors Catalog 01/18/2019   30589813 30589813 01/18/2019 01/18/2019 Journal Article

Powered by Koha