The Influence of Functional Shoulder Biomechanics as a Mediator of Patient Reported Outcomes Following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. (Record no. 5677)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03191nam a22003257a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 201229s20202020 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 0032-1052
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency Ovid MEDLINE(R)
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC)
PMID 33009332
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The Influence of Functional Shoulder Biomechanics as a Mediator of Patient Reported Outcomes Following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.
251 ## - Source
Source Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2020 Oct 01
252 ## - Abbreviated Source
Abbreviated source Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct 01
253 ## - Journal Name
Journal name Plastic and reconstructive surgery
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Year 2020
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Manufacturer FY2021
265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE]
Publication status aheadofprint
266 ## - Date added to catalog
Date added to catalog 2020-12-29
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction techniques differentially influence patient-reported physical and psychosocial well-being. Objective measures of shoulder biomechanics, which are uniquely influenced by reconstruction technique, may provide insight into the influence of reconstruction technique on patient-reported outcomes.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract CONCLUSIONS: In the current cohort, LD+subpectoral implant breast reconstructions significantly reduced shoulder strength and stiffness when compared to the other techniques. Additionally, objective measures of shoulder biomechanics were predictive of patient-reported physical and psychosocial well-being. Our results emphasize the need for improved peri-operative screening for shoulder functional deficits in patients undergoing breast reconstruction.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract METHODS: Robot-assisted measures of shoulder strength and stiffness, and patient-reported outcomes surveys (PROMIS-UE, SPADI, QuickDASH, SF12-PCS, SF12-MCS) were obtained from 46 women who had previously undergone mastectomy and a combined latissimus dorsi flap + subpectoral implant (LD + subpectoral implant), subpectoral implant, or DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Mediation analyses examined the role of functional shoulder biomechanics as a mediator between reconstruction technique and patient-reported outcomes.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract RESULTS: Reconstruction technique uniquely affected shoulder biomechanics, with LD+subpectoral implant patients exhibiting reduced shoulder strength and stiffness compared to subpectoral implant and DIEP flap patients. Increasing external rotation strength was predictive of increasing PROMIS-UE score (p=0.04), indicating improved upper extremity function. Increasing shoulder stiffness while at rest was predictive of increasing QuickDASH score (p=0.03), indicating worsened upper extremity function, while increasing stiffness at rest and during contraction was indicative of decreasing SF12-MCS score (all p<=0.02), indicating worsened psychosocial well-being. Reconstruction technique did not predict survey scores of function directly, or when mediated by functional shoulder biomechanics.
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED
656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION
Department Curtis National Hand Center
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION
Medline publication type Journal Article
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Giladi, Aviram M
790 ## - Authors
All authors Giladi AM, Kidwell KM, Leonardis JM, Lipps DB, Lyons DA, Momoh AO
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
DOI <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007486">https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007486</a>
Public note https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007486
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal Article
Item type description Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          MedStar Authors Catalog MedStar Authors Catalog 12/29/2020   33009332 33009332 12/29/2020 12/29/2020 Journal Article

Powered by Koha