Should asymptomatic cervical stenosis be treated in the setting of progressive thoracic myelopathy? A systematic review of the literature. [Review]

MedStar author(s):
Citation: European Spine Journal. 31(2):275-287, 2022 02.PMID: 34724109Department: MedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Neurosurgery ResidencyForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | ReviewSubject headings: *Spinal Cord Diseases | *Spinal Stenosis | Cervical Vertebrae/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] | Cervical Vertebrae/su [Surgery] | Constriction, Pathologic | Humans | Lumbar Vertebrae/su [Surgery] | Spinal Cord Diseases/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] | Spinal Cord Diseases/su [Surgery] | Spinal Stenosis/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] | Spinal Stenosis/ep [Epidemiology] | Spinal Stenosis/su [Surgery]Year: 2022ISSN:
  • 0940-6719
Name of journal: European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research SocietyAbstract: CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with myelopathy, both cervical and thoracic spine should be evaluated for TCTS. Order of operative intervention is tailored to clinical and radiographic information. In cases of thoracic myelopathy with asymptomatic cervical stenosis, thoracic intervention can be pursued with precautions to prevent further cervical cord injury. Copyright ♭ 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.METHODS: A systematic review of the literature through electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed to present the current literature that evaluates TCTS as it relates to incidence and surgical interventions. We also present two cases of patients undergoing operative intervention for thoracic myelopathy in the setting of concurrent cervical stenosis.PURPOSE: Unlike tandem stenosis of the cervical and lumbar spine, tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis (TCTS) of the spine is less common, and the approach and order of intervention are controversial. We aim to review the literature to evaluate the incidence and interventions for patients with cervical and thoracic stenosis. We provide illustrative cases to demonstrate that thoracic myelopathy in the setting of asymptomatic cervical stenosis can be treated safely.RESULTS: A total of 26 English original studies and case reports were identified. Nine studies evaluated the incidence of TCTS. 20 studies with a total of 168 patients with TCTS presented information on surgical intervention options. There is an overall aggregate incidence of 11.6% (530/4751) based on incidence studies. 165 patients underwent thoracic intervention. Of these patients, 63 patients underwent cervical intervention first, 29 underwent thoracic intervention first, and 73 underwent simultaneous, single-stage intervention.All authors: Black J, Dowlati E, Fayed I, Girish A, McGrail KM, Mualem W, Nunez J, Voyadzis JMOriginally published: European Spine Journal. 31(2):275-287, 2022 Feb.Fiscal year: FY2022Digital Object Identifier: ORCID: Date added to catalog: 2022-03-17
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 34724109 Available 34724109

CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with myelopathy, both cervical and thoracic spine should be evaluated for TCTS. Order of operative intervention is tailored to clinical and radiographic information. In cases of thoracic myelopathy with asymptomatic cervical stenosis, thoracic intervention can be pursued with precautions to prevent further cervical cord injury. Copyright ♭ 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

METHODS: A systematic review of the literature through electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed to present the current literature that evaluates TCTS as it relates to incidence and surgical interventions. We also present two cases of patients undergoing operative intervention for thoracic myelopathy in the setting of concurrent cervical stenosis.

PURPOSE: Unlike tandem stenosis of the cervical and lumbar spine, tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis (TCTS) of the spine is less common, and the approach and order of intervention are controversial. We aim to review the literature to evaluate the incidence and interventions for patients with cervical and thoracic stenosis. We provide illustrative cases to demonstrate that thoracic myelopathy in the setting of asymptomatic cervical stenosis can be treated safely.

RESULTS: A total of 26 English original studies and case reports were identified. Nine studies evaluated the incidence of TCTS. 20 studies with a total of 168 patients with TCTS presented information on surgical intervention options. There is an overall aggregate incidence of 11.6% (530/4751) based on incidence studies. 165 patients underwent thoracic intervention. Of these patients, 63 patients underwent cervical intervention first, 29 underwent thoracic intervention first, and 73 underwent simultaneous, single-stage intervention.

English

Powered by Koha