Statistical Fragility of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Arthroplasty Today. 20:101111, 2023 Apr.PMID: 36923060Institution: MedStar Union Memorial HospitalDepartment: Orthopaedic Surgery | Orthopaedic Surgery ResidencyForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleYear: 2023ISSN:
  • 2352-3441
Name of journal: Arthroplasty todayAbstract: Background: Statistical fragility is a quantitative measure of the robustness of the statistical conclusions drawn in a study. Although statistical fragility has been comprehensively evaluated in the arthroplasty literature, the statistical fragility of large-scale randomized trials evaluating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of applying the fragility index (FI) and the fragility quotient (FQ) analysis to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating VTE prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that RCTs evaluating VTE prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty may lack statistical stability as few outcome events are required to reverse the significance of outcomes. Future randomized trials should consider reporting FI and FQ along with the P value analysis to provide better context to the integrity of statistical stability. Copyright © 2023 The Authors.Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching multiple databases to identify RCTs that evaluated VTE prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty from 2000 to 2020. The FI was determined by manipulating each reported dichotomous outcome event until a reversal of significance was appreciated with 2 x 2 contingency tables. The associated FQ was determined by dividing the FI by the sample size.Results: Thirty-two RCTs were ultimately included for analysis. The overall FI incorporating all 32 RCTs was only 7 (interquartile range 3-9), suggesting that the reversal of only 7 events is required to change study significance. The associated FQ was determined to be 0.01. Of the RCTs that reported lost-to-follow-up data, the majority of studies had lost-to-follow-up numbers greater than 7.All authors: Sequeira SB, Duvall GT, Boucher HRFiscal year: FY2023Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2023-04-11
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article Available

Background: Statistical fragility is a quantitative measure of the robustness of the statistical conclusions drawn in a study. Although statistical fragility has been comprehensively evaluated in the arthroplasty literature, the statistical fragility of large-scale randomized trials evaluating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of applying the fragility index (FI) and the fragility quotient (FQ) analysis to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating VTE prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that RCTs evaluating VTE prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty may lack statistical stability as few outcome events are required to reverse the significance of outcomes. Future randomized trials should consider reporting FI and FQ along with the P value analysis to provide better context to the integrity of statistical stability. Copyright © 2023 The Authors.

Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching multiple databases to identify RCTs that evaluated VTE prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty from 2000 to 2020. The FI was determined by manipulating each reported dichotomous outcome event until a reversal of significance was appreciated with 2 x 2 contingency tables. The associated FQ was determined by dividing the FI by the sample size.

Results: Thirty-two RCTs were ultimately included for analysis. The overall FI incorporating all 32 RCTs was only 7 (interquartile range 3-9), suggesting that the reversal of only 7 events is required to change study significance. The associated FQ was determined to be 0.01. Of the RCTs that reported lost-to-follow-up data, the majority of studies had lost-to-follow-up numbers greater than 7.

English

Powered by Koha