The Impact of Institutional Factors on Physician Burnout: A National Study of Urology Trainees.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Urology. 131:27-35, 2019 Sep.PMID: 31199967Institution: MedStar Health | MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Urology | Vice PresidentForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Burnout, Professional/ep [Epidemiology] | *Internship and Residency | *Urology/ed [Education] | Adult | Burnout, Professional/et [Etiology] | Burnout, Professional/pc [Prevention & Control] | Female | Health Services Accessibility | Humans | Male | Mental Health Services | Mentors | Prevalence | Risk Factors | Self Report | United States/ep [Epidemiology]Year: 2019Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library:1999-2007ISSN:
  • 0090-4295
Name of journal: UrologyAbstract: CONCLUSION: The prevalence of burnout in urology trainees is high. Institutional factors such as formal mentorship and access to mental health services may play an important role in resident well-being.Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of burnout in urology trainees and examine the influence of personal, programmatic, and institutional factors on burnout rates.RESULTS: Overall response rate was 20.9%. Individual factors such as age, gender, exercise, and meditation were not associated with burnout while reading for relaxation (P=.022) and spending time with family (P=.025) were protective against burnout. Residents working >80 hours vs 60-80 hours and <60 hours per week were more likely to exhibit burnout (77.6% vs 66.1% vs 47.1%, respectively, P=.044). Institutional factors such as structured mentorship programs (P=.019) and access to mental health services (P <.001) were associated with decreased burnout. On multivariable analysis, unavailable or difficult-to-access mental health services were associated with increased odds of burnout (OR 5.38, 95%CI 2.20-13.16, P <.001, and OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.07-5.07, P=.034, respectively).STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an anonymous survey of burnout in urology residents across the United States using a 50-question REDCap-based electronic questionnaire in May of 2018. The survey included demographic questions, an inventory of stress-reduction techniques and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Univariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess associations between individual, program, and organizational factors and resident burnout.All authors: Brems J, Krasnow R, Lynch JH, Marchalik D, Padmore J, Rodriguez A, Stamatakis LOriginally published: Urology. 2019 Jun 11Fiscal year: FY2020Fiscal year of original publication: FY2019Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2019-07-24
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 31199967 Available 31199967

Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library:1999-2007

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of burnout in urology trainees is high. Institutional factors such as formal mentorship and access to mental health services may play an important role in resident well-being.

Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of burnout in urology trainees and examine the influence of personal, programmatic, and institutional factors on burnout rates.

RESULTS: Overall response rate was 20.9%. Individual factors such as age, gender, exercise, and meditation were not associated with burnout while reading for relaxation (P=.022) and spending time with family (P=.025) were protective against burnout. Residents working >80 hours vs 60-80 hours and <60 hours per week were more likely to exhibit burnout (77.6% vs 66.1% vs 47.1%, respectively, P=.044). Institutional factors such as structured mentorship programs (P=.019) and access to mental health services (P <.001) were associated with decreased burnout. On multivariable analysis, unavailable or difficult-to-access mental health services were associated with increased odds of burnout (OR 5.38, 95%CI 2.20-13.16, P <.001, and OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.07-5.07, P=.034, respectively).

STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an anonymous survey of burnout in urology residents across the United States using a 50-question REDCap-based electronic questionnaire in May of 2018. The survey included demographic questions, an inventory of stress-reduction techniques and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Univariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess associations between individual, program, and organizational factors and resident burnout.

English

Powered by Koha