Cost-Effectiveness of an Antibacterial Envelope for CIED Infection Prevention in the US Healthcare System from the WRAP-IT Trial.

Available online from MWHC library: 2008 - present

Background - In the WRAP-IT trial, adjunctive use of an absorbable antibacterial envelope resulted in a 40% reduction of major cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection without increased risk of complication in 6,983 patients undergoing CIED revision, replacement, upgrade, or initial cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implant. There is limited information on the cost-effectiveness of this strategy. As a pre-specified objective, we evaluated antibacterial envelope cost-effectiveness compared to standard-of-care infection prevention strategies in the US healthcare system. Methods - A decision tree model was used to compare costs and outcomes of antibacterial envelope (TYRX) use adjunctive to standard-of-care infection prevention vs. standard-of-care alone over a lifelong time horizon. The analysis was performed from an integrated payer-provider network perspective. Infection rates, antibacterial envelope effectiveness, infection treatment costs and patterns, infection-related mortality, and utility estimates were obtained from the WRAP-IT trial. Life expectancy and long-term costs associated with device replacement, follow-up, and healthcare utilization were sourced from the literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 3%. An upper willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 50,000 per QALY was used to determine cost-effectiveness, in alignment with American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) practice guidelines and as supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) and contemporary literature. Results - The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the antibacterial envelope compared to standard-of-care was 12,603/QALY. The ICER remained lower than the WTP threshold in 74% of iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and was most sensitive to the following model inputs: infection-related mortality, life expectancy, and infection cost. Conclusions - The absorbable antibacterial envelope was associated with a cost-effectiveness ratio below contemporary benchmarks in the WRAP-IT patient population, suggesting that the envelope provides value for the US healthcare system by reducing the incidence of CIED infection.

English