Association Between Conflict of Interest and Published Position on Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Sleep Apnea.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery. 165(2):375-380, 2021 08.PMID: 33400633Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: OtolaryngologyForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Conflict of Interest/ec [Economics] | *Electric Stimulation Therapy | *Financial Support/es [Ethics] | *Hypoglossal Nerve | *Sleep Apnea Syndromes/th [Therapy] | Cross-Sectional Studies | Humans | Retrospective StudiesYear: 2021Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006ISSN:
  • 0194-5998
Name of journal: Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryAbstract: CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates an association between published position on hypoglossal nerve stimulator use and financial conflict with the device manufacturer. Several undeclared conflicts were also found, suggesting a role for independent search for conflicts during the review process.METHODS: A Google Scholar search was performed for editorials and reviews citing the 2014 New England Journal of Medicine article on hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. Included articles were coded as favorable or neutral. Conflict of interest was recorded as declared by the authors in these articles and as independently searched in the Open Payments registry.OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is an association between authors' financial conflict of interest and published position on clinical use of hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.RESULTS: Sixteen articles from 45 independent authors were analyzed. Nine articles by authors were coded as favorable. Among authors of articles with favorable views, 16 (59%) had a financial conflict of interest with the manufacturer of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator device, as opposed to only 1 of 21 (5%) authors of neutral/unfavorable articles. When we included only authors to whom payments could be identified or excluded on Open Payments, 16 of 20 (80%; 95% CI, 62%-98%) authors of favorable articles had a financial conflict, while 1 of 10 (10%; 95% CI, 0%-29.6%) of neutral/unfavorable articles did (P = .004).SETTING: International roster of authors and articles analyzed.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.All authors: Crossley JR, Davidson B, Giurintano JP, Hoa M, Wallerius KOriginally published: Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery. :194599820982914, 2021 Jan 05Fiscal year: FY2022Fiscal year of original publication: FY2021Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2021-02-17
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 33400633 Available 33400633

Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006

CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates an association between published position on hypoglossal nerve stimulator use and financial conflict with the device manufacturer. Several undeclared conflicts were also found, suggesting a role for independent search for conflicts during the review process.

METHODS: A Google Scholar search was performed for editorials and reviews citing the 2014 New England Journal of Medicine article on hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. Included articles were coded as favorable or neutral. Conflict of interest was recorded as declared by the authors in these articles and as independently searched in the Open Payments registry.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is an association between authors' financial conflict of interest and published position on clinical use of hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.

RESULTS: Sixteen articles from 45 independent authors were analyzed. Nine articles by authors were coded as favorable. Among authors of articles with favorable views, 16 (59%) had a financial conflict of interest with the manufacturer of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator device, as opposed to only 1 of 21 (5%) authors of neutral/unfavorable articles. When we included only authors to whom payments could be identified or excluded on Open Payments, 16 of 20 (80%; 95% CI, 62%-98%) authors of favorable articles had a financial conflict, while 1 of 10 (10%; 95% CI, 0%-29.6%) of neutral/unfavorable articles did (P = .004).

SETTING: International roster of authors and articles analyzed.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

English

Powered by Koha