Minimally invasive surgery for intradural extramedullary spinal cord pathologies: A case series and technical note.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 97:108-114, 2022 Mar.PMID: 35091315Department: MedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Neurosurgery ResidencyForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Spinal Cord Neoplasms | Humans | Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/mt [Methods] | Retrospective Studies | Spinal Cord Neoplasms/pa [Pathology] | Spinal Cord Neoplasms/su [Surgery] | Treatment OutcomeYear: 2022Name of journal: Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of AustralasiaAbstract: BACKGROUND: Intradural spinal cord pathologies have traditionally been managed with open surgical procedures and require the completion of a durotomy. Minimally invasive techniques are emerging as alternative procedures with the goal of reducing complications, but often require specialized equipment with additional training.CONCLUSIONS: Our novel MIS technique for intradural extramedullary pathologies appears to be safe and effective in creating a watertight dural closure using standard operating room equipment, while avoiding the costs and training associated with specialized equipment and possibly improving surgical outcome measures when compared to open approaches. Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.METHODS: We conduct a single institution retrospective review from 2016 to 2019 of patients undergoing minimally invasive durotomy closure for intradural extramedullary pathologies using a novel technique that utilizes standard operating room equipment. This cohort is compared to a cohort of patients treated with a traditional open approach.RESULTS: Patients treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) had no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics compared to patients treated with open procedures. Patients treated with MIS had decreases in complication rates, estimated blood loss, and length of stay in the hospital compared to the patients treated with open procedures, but these differences did not reach levels of statistical significance.All authors: Anaizi A, Conte A, Fayed I, Kelly R, Nair N, Rock M, Sandhu F, Voyadzis JMOriginally published: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 97:108-114, 2022 Jan 25.Fiscal year: FY2022Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2022-02-22
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 35091315 Available 35091315

BACKGROUND: Intradural spinal cord pathologies have traditionally been managed with open surgical procedures and require the completion of a durotomy. Minimally invasive techniques are emerging as alternative procedures with the goal of reducing complications, but often require specialized equipment with additional training.

CONCLUSIONS: Our novel MIS technique for intradural extramedullary pathologies appears to be safe and effective in creating a watertight dural closure using standard operating room equipment, while avoiding the costs and training associated with specialized equipment and possibly improving surgical outcome measures when compared to open approaches. Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

METHODS: We conduct a single institution retrospective review from 2016 to 2019 of patients undergoing minimally invasive durotomy closure for intradural extramedullary pathologies using a novel technique that utilizes standard operating room equipment. This cohort is compared to a cohort of patients treated with a traditional open approach.

RESULTS: Patients treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) had no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics compared to patients treated with open procedures. Patients treated with MIS had decreases in complication rates, estimated blood loss, and length of stay in the hospital compared to the patients treated with open procedures, but these differences did not reach levels of statistical significance.

English

Powered by Koha