TY - BOOK AU - Ertreo, Marco TI - Comparison of Cone-Beam Tomography and Cross-Sectional Imaging for Volumetric and Dosimetric Calculations in Resin Yttrium-90 Radioembolization SN - 0174-1551 PY - 2018/// KW - *Brachytherapy/mt [Methods] KW - *Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/mt [Methods] KW - *Liver Neoplasms/rt [Radiotherapy] KW - *Magnetic Resonance Imaging/mt [Methods] KW - *Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/mt [Methods] KW - *Yttrium Radioisotopes/tu [Therapeutic Use] KW - Adult KW - Aged KW - Aged, 80 and over KW - Contrast Media KW - Female KW - Humans KW - Image Enhancement/mt [Methods] KW - Liver Neoplasms/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] KW - Liver Neoplasms/pa [Pathology] KW - Liver/dg [Diagnostic Imaging] KW - Liver/pa [Pathology] KW - Liver/re [Radiation Effects] KW - Male KW - Middle Aged KW - Multimodal Imaging/mt [Methods] KW - Organ Size KW - Radiotherapy Dosage KW - Retrospective Studies KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/mt [Methods] KW - MedStar Washington Hospital Center KW - Radiology KW - Journal Article N2 - CONCLUSIONS: Although volume measurements derived from CT/MRI did not differ significantly from those derived from CBCT, variability between the two methods led to large and unexpected differences in calculated dose; MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study retrospectively assessed 47 consecutive patients who underwent resin Y-90 radioembolization consecutively over a 2-year period at a single center. Volume calculation software was used to determine perfused lobar liver volumes from cone-beam CT (CBCT) images obtained during mapping angiography. CBCT-derived volumes were compared with perfused lobar volume derived from contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Nominal activities as determined by the SIR-Spheres Microspheres Activity Calculator were similarly calculated and compared using both CBCT and conventionally acquired volumes; PURPOSE: To compare the use of cone-beam computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the calculation of liver volume and planned dose for yttrium-90 radioembolization; RESULTS: A total of 82 hepatic lobes were assessed in 47 patients. The mean percentage difference between combined CT-MRI- and CBCT-derived calculated lobar volumes was 25.3% (p=0.994). The mean percentage difference in calculated dose between the two methods was 21.8+/-24.6% (p=0.42). Combined left and right lobar CT-derived dose difference was less than 10% in 22 lobes, between 10 and 25% in 20 lobes, between 25 and 50% in 13 lobes and greater than 50% in 5 lobes. Combined left and right lobar MRI-derived dose difference was less than 10% in 11 lobes, between 10 and 25% in 7 lobes, between 25 and 50% in 2 lobes and greater than 50% in 1 lobe UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2030-0 ER -